Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298242›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Test Result Management Practices of Canadian Internal Medicine Physicians and Trainees.

Thomas Bodley, Janice L Kwan, John Matelski, Patrick J Darragh, Peter Cram

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas BodleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. thomas.bodley@mail.utoronto.ca.
Janice L KwanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John MatelskiDivision of General Internal Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patrick J DarraghDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter CramDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sinai Health System · CAToronto East General Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Building Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research at the University of IowaK24AR062133 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CRAM, PETER M · 2012 to 2016
$594k
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR062133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissed test results are a cause of medical error. Few studies have explored test result management in the inpatient setting.

objectiveTo examine test result management practices of general internal medicine providers in the inpatient setting, examine satisfaction with practices, and quantify self-reported delays in result follow-up.

designCross-sectional survey.

participantsGeneral internal medicine attending physicians and trainees (residents and medical students) at three Canadian teaching hospitals. MAIN MEASURES: Methods used to track test results; satisfaction with these methods; personal encounters with results respondents "wish they had known about sooner." KEY

resultsWe received surveys from 33/51 attendings and 99/108 trainees (response rate 83%). Only 40.9% of respondents kept a record of all tests they order, and 50.0% had a system to ensure ordered tests were completed. Methods for tracking test results included typed team sign-out lists (40.7%), electronic health record (EHR) functionality (e.g., the electronic "inbox") (38.9%), and personal written or typed lists (14.8%). Almost all trainees (97.9%) and attendings (81.2%) reported encountering at least one test result they "wish they had known about sooner" in the past 2 months (p = 0.001). A higher percentage of attendings kept a record of tests pending at hospital discharge compared to trainees (75.0% vs. 35.7%, p < 0.001), used EHR functionality to track tests (71.4% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.004), and reported higher satisfaction with result management (42.4% vs. 12.1% satisfied or very satisfied, p < 0.001).

conclusionsCanadian physicians report an array of problems managing test results in the inpatient setting. In the context of prior studies from the outpatient setting, our study suggests a need to develop interventions to prevent missed results and avoid potential patient harms.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineEducation, Medical, GraduateHospitals, TeachingAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternal MedicineInternship and ResidencyRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportTraining Supportcare transitionselectronic health recordshospital medicine

Identifiers

PMID30298242
PMCPMC6318178
OpenAlexW2897025502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.