Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298240›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2018

The Impact of Interictal Discharges on Performance.

Edward Faught, Ioannis Karakis, Daniel L Drane

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04141332 (Specific Language Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04141332 completednot on this map

Specific Language Impairment (SLI) in Children May Caused by Epileptic Brain Activity

TypeobservationalSponsorMansoura University HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled160ConditionsSpecific Language ImpairmentArmsEEG was recorded by EEG Machines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The epileptic blip syndrome.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward FaughtEmory University, Brain Health Center 292, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30306, USA. rfaught@emory.edu.
Ioannis KarakisEmory University, Brain Health Center 292, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30306, USA.
Daniel L DraneEmory University, Brain Health Center 292, 12 Executive Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30306, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOur purpose is to review evidence relating to the concept that interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) impair brain performance. RECENT

findingsSophisticated measures of motor and cognitive performance have clarified older observations, confirming that in both animals and humans, IEDs affect aspects of performance, IED morphology, frequency, anatomical distribution, and duration matter. However, we now know that it is difficult to draw a line between IEDs and seizures, not only by electrical criteria but even by metabolic and molecular measures. IEDs impair performance acutely and probably chronically. Thus, there are good theoretical reasons for suppressing them, but no consensus has been reached on how much effort this deserves. Many antiepileptic medications effective for control of clinical seizures have little effect on IEDs. Better methods of measuring outcomes may allow selection of individual patients for whom treatment aimed at IEDs is worthwhile.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsBrainElectroencephalographyHumansSeizuresAnticonvulsantsAntiepileptic drugsEEGEpilepsyInterictal dischargesPerformance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.