Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298220›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2018

A common goodness-of-fit framework for neural population models using marked point process time-rescaling.

Long Tao, Karoline E Weber, Kensuke Arai, Uri T Eden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Long TaoBoston University College of Arts and Sciences, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. longtao2@bu.edu.
Karoline E WeberBoston University College of Arts and Sciences, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kensuke AraiBoston University College of Arts and Sciences, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Uri T EdenBoston University College of Arts and Sciences, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

Funding

Real-time analysis of memories and decisionsR01MH105174 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDEN, URI TZVI, FRANK, LOREN M · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical component of any statistical modeling procedure is the ability to assess the goodness-of-fit between a model and observed data. For spike train models of individual neurons, many goodness-of-fit measures rely on the time-rescaling theorem and assess model quality using rescaled spike times. Recently, there has been increasing interest in statistical models that describe the simultaneous spiking activity of neuron populations, either in a single brain region or across brain regions. Classically, such models have used spike sorted data to describe relationships between the identified neurons, but more recently clusterless modeling methods have been used to describe population activity using a single model. Here we develop a generalization of the time-rescaling theorem that enables comprehensive goodness-of-fit analysis for either of these classes of population models. We use the theory of marked point processes to model population spiking activity, and show that under the correct model, each spike can be rescaled individually to generate a uniformly distributed set of events in time and the space of spike marks. After rescaling, multiple well-established goodness-of-fit procedures and statistical tests are available. We demonstrate the application of these methods both to simulated data and real population spiking in rat hippocampus. We have made the MATLAB and Python code used for the analyses in this paper publicly available through our Github repository at https://github.com/Eden-Kramer-Lab/popTRT .

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, StatisticalAction PotentialsBrainComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetNeuronsTime FactorsGoodness-of-fitKS plotsNeural modelingNeural population activitySpike trainsTime-rescaling

Identifiers

PMID30298220
PMCPMC6208891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.