Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298139›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2018

Spatially-Compact MR-Guided Kernel EM for PET Image Reconstruction.

James Bland, Martin A Belzunce, Sam Ellis, Colm J McGinnity, Alexander Hammers, Andrew J Reader

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Correction Techniques for the Spill in Effect in Emission Tomography.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of PET-MR Inconsistency in the Kernel Image Reconstruction Method.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James BlandKing's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
Martin A BelzunceKing's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
Sam EllisKing's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
Colm J McGinnityKing's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
Alexander HammersKing's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
Andrew J ReaderKing's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
St Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013042/1Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a highly sensitive functional and molecular imaging modality which can measure picomolar concentrations of an injected radionuclide. However, the physical sensitivity of PET is limited, and reducing the injected dose leads to low count data and noisy reconstructed images. A highly effective way of reducing noise is to reparameterise the reconstruction in terms of MR-derived spatial basis functions. Spatial basis functions derived using the kernel method have demonstrated excellent noise reduction properties and maintain shared PET-MR detailed structures. However, as previously shown in the literature, the MR-guided kernel method may lead to excessive smoothing of structures that are only present in the PET data. This work makes two main contributions in order to address this problem: first, we exploit the potential of the MR-guided kernel method to form more spatially-compact basis functions which are able to preserve PET-unique structures, and secondly, we consider reconstruction at the native MR resolution. The former contribution notably improves the recovery of structures which are unique to the PET data. These adaptations of the kernel method were compared to the conventional implementation of the MR-guided kernel method and also to MLEM, in terms of ability to recover PET unique structures for both simulated and real data. The spatially-compact kernel method showed clear visual and quantitative improvements in the reconstruction of the PET unique structures, relative to the conventional kernel method for all sizes of PET unique structures investigated, whilst maintaining to a large extent the impressive noise mitigating and detail preserving properties of the conventional MR-guided kernel method. We therefore conclude that a spatially-compact parameterisation of the MR-guided kernel method, should be the preferred implementation strategy in order to obviate unnecessary losses in PET-unique details.

Indexed as

image reconstructionPET-MRpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID30298139
PMCPMC6173308
OpenAlexW2807474247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.