ArticleStatistics in biosciences2018
Estimating Treatment Effects for Recurrent Events in the Presence of Rescue Medications: An Application to the Immune Thrombocytopenia Study.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many clinical studies, patients may experience the same type of event of interest repeatedly over time. However, the assessment of treatment effects is often complicated by the rescue medication uses due to ethical reasons. For example, in the motivating trial in studying the Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), when the interest lies in evaluating the treatment benefit of investigational product (IP) on reducing patient's repeated bleeding, rescue medication such as platelet transfusions may be allowed to raise platelet counts. Both the intention-to-treat analysis and treating the intermediate rescue medication as covariate tend to attenuate the treatment benefit, and the estimates can be biased if interpreted as causal. In this paper, we propose a general causal framework when intermediate rescue medications are informative. We adopt the inverse weighted estimation approach to estimate the treatment effect, where weights are constructed to reflect time-dependent medication use probabilities. The proposed estimators are shown to be asymptotically normal and are demonstrated to perform well in small-sample simulation studies. The application to the ITP studies reveals a stronger benefit of using IP in reducing bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.