Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297967›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2018

Genetic dissection of interspecific differences in yeast thermotolerance.

Carly V Weiss, Jeremy I Roop, Rylee K Hackley, Julie N Chuong, Igor V Grigoriev, Adam P Arkin, Jeffrey M Skerker, Rachel B Brem

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Building synthetic chromosomes from natural DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carly V WeissDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jeremy I RoopDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. jeremyianroop@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4239-7221
Rylee K HackleyDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Julie N ChuongBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA.
Igor V GrigorievDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8903
Adam P ArkinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-2931
Jeffrey M SkerkerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Rachel B BremDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. rbrem@buckinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-9434

Funding

Mapping deep evolutionary divergences in cellular models of stress responseR01GM120430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BREM, RACHEL BETH · 2017 to 2025
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the most unique and compelling survival strategies in the natural world are fixed in isolated species

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic LinkageGenetic VariationGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityThermotoleranceDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID30297967
PMCPMC6430122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.