Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297964›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Guide Swap enables genome-scale pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screening in human primary cells.

Pamela Y Ting, Albert E Parker, J Scott Lee, Chris Trussell, Orzala Sharif, Fabio Luna, Glenn Federe, S Whitney Barnes, John R Walker, Julie Vance and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Orthogonal transcriptional modulation and gene editing using multiple CRISPR-Cas systems.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Pamela Y TingGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Albert E ParkerGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Scott LeeGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Chris TrussellGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Orzala SharifGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Fabio LunaGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Glenn FedereGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
S Whitney BarnesGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
John R WalkerGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Julie VanceGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mu-Yun GaoGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Heath E KlockGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Scott ClarksonNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Carsten RussNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Loren J MiragliaGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-628X
Michael P CookeGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Anthony E BoitanoGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Peter McNamaraGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
John LambGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Christian SchmedtGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jennifer L SneadGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA. jsnead@gnf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0733-8285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 screening allows genome-wide interrogation of gene function. Currently, to achieve the high and uniform Cas9 expression desirable for screening, one needs to engineer stable and clonal Cas9-expressing cells-an approach that is not applicable in human primary cells. Guide Swap permits genome-scale pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screening in human primary cells by exploiting the unexpected finding that editing by lentivirally delivered, targeted guide RNAs (gRNAs) occurs efficiently when Cas9 is introduced in complex with nontargeting gRNA. We validated Guide Swap in depletion and enrichment screens in CD4

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, HumanCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCRISPR-Associated Protein 9HEK293 CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.