ArticleScientific reports2018
A reference document on Permissible Limits for solvents and buffers during in vitro antimalarial screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimalarial Activity of Aqueous Extracts of Nasturtium (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Antiplasmodial Activity Evaluation of a Bestatin-Related Aminopeptidase Inhibitor, Phebestin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023Article
- Eryptosis and Malaria: New Experimental Guidelines and Re-Evaluation of the Antimalarial Potential of Eryptosis Inducers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Diamond Magnetic Microscopy of Malarial Hemozoin Nanocrystals.Physical review applied · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Antimalarial drug discovery expands on targeted and phenotype-based screening of potential inhibitory molecules to ascertain overall efficacy, phenotypic characteristics and toxicity, prior to exploring pharmacological optimizations. Candidate inhibitors may have varying chemical properties, thereby requiring specific reconstitution conditions to ensure solubility, stability or bioavailability. Hence, a variety of solvents, buffers, detergents and stabilizers become part of antimalarial efficacy assays, all of which, above certain threshold could interfere with parasite viability, invasion or red blood cell properties leading to misinterpretation of the results. Despite their routine use across malaria research laboratories, there is no documentation on non-toxic range for common constituents including DMSO, glycerol, ethanol and methanol. We herein constructed a compatibility reference guide for 14 such chemicals and estimated their Permissible Limit against P. falciparum asexual stages at which viability and replication of parasites are not compromised. We also demonstrate that at the estimated Permissible Limit, red blood cells remain healthy and viable for infection by merozoites. Taken together, this dataset provides a valuable reference tool for the acceptable concentration range for common chemicals during in vitro antimalarial tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.