Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Somatic alterations in circulating cell-free DNA of oesophageal carcinoma patients during primary staging are indicative for post-surgical tumour recurrence.

Helen Pasternack, Jana Fassunke, Patrick Sven Plum, Seung-Hun Chon, Daniel Alexander Hescheler, Asmae Gassa, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Christiane Josephine Bruns, Sven Perner, Michael Hallek and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell-Free DNA: Hope and Potential Application in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen PasternackInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Luebeck and Borstel, Germany.
Jana FassunkeInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Patrick Sven PlumDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-4553
Seung-Hun ChonDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel Alexander HeschelerDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Asmae GassaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane Josephine BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sven PernerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Luebeck and Borstel, Germany.
Michael HallekDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Elfriede BollschweilerDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Arnulf Heinrich HölscherCenter for Oesophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas ZanderDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jonathan WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Hakan AlakusDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. hakan.alakus@uk-koeln.de.
University Hospital Cologne · DEResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DEAgaplesion Markus Hospital · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal cancer (OC) has high mortality. This study aims at determining the feasibility of liquid biopsies for genomic profiling in early stage OC, comparing two different technologies for mutational analysis in circulating cell -free DNA (ccfDNA) and evaluating the clinical impact of these somatic alterations during primary staging. In 25 patients with locally advanced OC, endoscopic tumour biopsies and simultaneous blood samples were taken during primary staging. Genomic DNA from biopsies and ccfDNA were analysed for mutations using a 12 gene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay as well as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Genetic data was correlated with patients' outcome. In 21 of the tested biopsies (84%) at least one somatic mutation was detected by NGS. Mutations detected by NGS were detectable by ddPCR with similar allele frequencies. In three out of the 21 patients with proven mutations, the same mutations were also detectable in ccfDNA using NGS (14%). In contrast, ddPCR detected mutations in ccfDNA of five additional patients (8/21, 38%). Post-surgical outcome analysis was performed for those patients who had received complete tumour resection (n = 16). Five of them suffered from an early relapse within the first year after surgery, including four with detectable somatic mutations in ccfDNA during primary staging. Taken together, we showed a higher sensitivity for ddPCR compared to NGS in detecting mutated ccfDNA in OC. Detection of somatically altered ccfDNA during primary staging seems to be indicative for post-surgical tumour recurrence.

Indexed as

MutationAgedAged, 80 and overCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA Mutational AnalysisEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisTreatment OutcomeCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID30297788
PMCPMC6175817
OpenAlexW2894724052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.