Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Multiple uncertainties require a change of conservation practices for saproxylic beetles in managed temperate forests.

Andrey L D Augustynczik, Rasoul Yousefpour, Marc Hanewinkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey L D AugustynczikChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4 (2. OG), D-79106, Freiburg, Germany. andrey.lessa@ife.uni-freiburg.de.
Rasoul YousefpourChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4 (2. OG), D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-8279
Marc HanewinkelChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4 (2. OG), D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4081-6621
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 2123European Commission (EC) 226544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Europe, intensive forest management has severely compromised the habitat of forest insects, especially saproxylic beetles, due to the removal of deadwood and veteran trees. The loss of insect diversity may disrupt ecosystem functioning and affect the provision of important ecosystem goods and services in the future. Here we propose a novel approach for the implementation of conservation policies, by optimally allocating forest reserves and deadwood islands under multiple sources of uncertainty and minimizing economic risk. We use the saproxylic beetle Lucanus cervus as umbrella species, requiring that deadwood islands were spaced within its dispersal capacity. We show that current management and conservation practices are increasingly inefficient under changing environmental conditions and that the consideration of uncertainty requires a major expansion of conservation areas. Moreover, our results indicate that a strong diversification of management regimes, with a focus on selection forest systems, is required to reduce economic risk of forest management. We conclude that the integration of uncertainty into conservation planning may reduce the trade-off between production and conservation objectives in forest landscapes and is key to increase the efficiency of forest management in the future.

Identifiers

PMID30297782
PMCPMC6175923
OpenAlexW2894646728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.