Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297748›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2018

Early neurogenomic response associated with variation in guppy female mate preference.

Natasha I Bloch, Alberto Corral-López, Séverine D Buechel, Alexander Kotrschal, Niclas Kolm, Judith E Mank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Divergent sensory transcriptomic profiles in positive and negative learning in Bicyclus Anynana butterflies.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Behavioural ecology in the twenty-first century.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Repeated evolution of a complex behaviour.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natasha I BlochDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. n.bloch@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-1027
Alberto Corral-LópezDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Séverine D BuechelDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander KotrschalDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-1402
Niclas Kolm *Department of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-336X
Judith E Mank *Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 680951Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of mate choice requires dissecting the mechanisms of female preference, particularly how these differ among social contexts and preference phenotypes. Here, we studied the female neurogenomic response after only 10 min of mate exposure in both a sensory component (optic tectum) and a decision-making component (telencephalon) of the brain. By comparing the transcriptional response between females with and without preferences for colourful males, we identified unique neurogenomic elements associated with the female preference phenotype that are not present in females without preference. A network analysis revealed different properties for this response at the sensory-processing and the decision-making levels, and we show that this response is highly centralized in the telencephalon. Furthermore, we identified an additional set of genes that vary in expression across social contexts, beyond mate evaluation. We show that transcription factors among these loci are predicted to regulate the transcriptional response of the genes we found to be associated with female preference.

Indexed as

AnimalsDecision MakingFemaleGenomeMating Preference, AnimalPoeciliaSensationSuperior ColliculiTelencephalon

Identifiers

PMID30297748
PMCPMC6349141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.