Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297515›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

Relationship between Circulating Inflammation Proteins and Lung Cancer Diagnosis in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Derek Brown, Adriana Zingone, Yunkai Yu, Bin Zhu, Julián Candia, Liang Cao, Bríd M Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Circulating Inflammation Proteins Associated With Lung Cancer in African Americans.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derek Brown *Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Adriana Zingone *Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yunkai YuGenetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bin ZhuBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Julián CandiaTrans-NIH Center for Human Immunology (CHI), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5793-8989
Liang CaoGenetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bríd M RyanLaboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Brid.Ryan@nih.gov.

Funding

Center for Human Immunology ZICAI001226 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CHERRY, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$34.1M
Understanding the Science Behind Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer IncidenceZIABC011554 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RYAN, BRID · 2014 to 2021
$7.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously, we observed a strong relationship between circulating serum inflammation proteins in relation to lung cancer diagnosis and risk, both in case-control and prospective cohorts. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has a high prevalence of false-positive nodules, thus companion noninvasive biomarkers that can distinguish between benign and malignant nodules could have clinical utility and positive impact on patient outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a nested case-control study within the National Lung Screening Trial. Concentrations of 30 inflammation proteins were measured on plasma samples of 262 cases and 528 controls using a highly sensitive and analytically validated electrochemiluminescence V-PLEX immunoassay.

resultsComparing the fourth quartile with the first quartile, we found increased IFNγ and IL12/IL23p40 associated with increased odds of a lung cancer diagnosis [OR 1.89, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.16-3.09; OR 2.49, 95% CI, 1.46-4.23, respectively]. Confirming our previous observations, we also detected a relationship between increased IL6, IL8, and C-reactive protein (CRP) with lung cancer diagnosis. These relationships were significant after adjustment for age, gender, race, smoking, body mass index (BMI), family history of lung cancer, and previous diagnoses of inflammatory conditions. However, none of these proteins could distinguish between a benign and malignant lung nodule (IL6: OR 1.25, 95% CI, 0.59-2.64; IL8: OR 1.40, 95% CI, 0.70-2.81; CRP: OR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.45-2.12).

conclusionsWe have discovered new associations for IFNγ and IL12/IL23p40 with lung cancer but have no evidence that these proteins can distinguish between benign and malignant lung nodules. IMPACT: Circulating inflammation proteins are unlikely to have utility as companion LDCT biomarkers.

Indexed as

InflammationAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinCytokinesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRandom AllocationBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinCytokines

Identifiers

PMID30297515
PMCPMC6325020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.