Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297493›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2018

Pericardial sarcoma.

Mahmoud Abdelnaby, Abdallah Almaghraby, Yehia Saleh, Rasha Abayazeed

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cardiogenic shock in cancer.Heart failure reviews · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mahmoud AbdelnabyDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-9049
Abdallah AlmaghrabyDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Yehia SalehDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-5582
Rasha AbayazeedDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericardial sarcomas are extremely rare aggressive neoplasms. Non-specific symptoms and incidental discovery are usually the rule. Multimodality imaging is extremely important for diagnosis and tissue characterisation of all cardiac masses. Despite treatment, pericardial sarcomas are considered extremely fatal. We encountered a 27-year-old female patient who presented to our facility with progressive dyspnoea. On examination, clinical signs of cardiac tamponade were appreciated, transthoracic echocardiography revealed a tamponading pericardial effusion and a large heterogeneous pericardial mass. Pericardiocentesis revealed haemorrhagic fluid. Subsequently, CT revealed a pericardial mass compressing the right atrium. Excision biopsy showed a well-circumscribed mass, and cut sections showed friable grey-white tissue with areas of haemorrhage and necrosis. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of high-grade undifferentiated sarcoma of the pericardium. The patient was started on adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Follow-up after 1 year showed no relapse.

Indexed as

PericardiumAdultCardiac TamponadeChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyDiagnosis, DifferentialDyspneaFemaleHumansRadiotherapySarcomaTomography, X-Ray Computedcancer interventioncancer - see oncologypericardial disease

Identifiers

PMID30297493
PMCPMC6194453
OpenAlexW4206631725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.