Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297439›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018

Long term adjuvant endocrine therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease in female breast cancer survivors: systematic review.

Anthony Matthews, Susannah Stanway, Ruth E Farmer, Helen Strongman, Sara Thomas, Alexander R Lyon, Liam Smeeth, Krishnan Bhaskaran

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Aromatase enzyme: Paving the way for exploring aromatization for cardio-renal protection.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anthony MatthewsDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK anthony.matthews@lshtm.ac.uk.
Susannah StanwayRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ruth E FarmerDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen StrongmanDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sara ThomasDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alexander R LyonFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Liam SmeethDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Krishnan BhaskaranDepartment of Non-Communicable Diseases Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of endocrine therapies on a wide range of specific clinical cardiovascular disease outcomes in women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline and Embase up until June 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies were included if they investigated the risk of a specific cardiovascular disease outcome associated with use of either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, or compared the two treatments, in women with a history of non-metastatic breast cancer. APPRAISAL AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant studies were originally identified and results extracted by one researcher, with a full replication of the study identification process by a combination of two other researchers. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to assess risk of bias in randomised controlled trials, and this tool was adapted to assess risk of bias in observational studies.

results26 studies were identified, with results for seven specific cardiovascular disease outcomes (venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, heart failure, arrhythmia, and peripheral vascular disease). Results suggested an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in tamoxifen users compared with both non-users and aromatase inhibitor users. Results were also consistent with a higher risk of the vascular diseases myocardial infarction and angina in aromatase inhibitor users compared with tamoxifen users, but there was also a suggestion that this may be partly driven by a protective effect of tamoxifen on these outcomes. Data were limited, and evidence was generally inconsistent for all other cardiovascular disease outcomes.

conclusionThis review has collated substantial randomised controlled trial and observational evidence on the effect of endocrine therapies on several specific cardiovascular disease outcomes including venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction, progressing knowledge. Although the choice of aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen will primarily be based on the effectiveness against the recurrence of breast cancer, this review shows that the individual patient's risk of venous or arterial vascular disease should be an important secondary consideration. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42017065944.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTamoxifenAdjuvants, ImmunologicAromatase InhibitorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID30297439
PMCPMC6174332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.