Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297437›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

GP follow-up after first diagnosing psychological problems among adolescents: a nationwide register-based study.

Øystein Hetlevik, Christina Hagen Bjørnå, Ina-Terese Lundring, Sturla Gjesdal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics of the ideal healthcare services to meet adolescents' mental health needs: A qualitative study of adolescents' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Øystein HetlevikDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christina Hagen BjørnåHospital of Vestfold, Tønsberg, Norway.
Ina-Terese LundringHaukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Sturla GjesdalDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological problems are common among adolescents. Many GPs consider these problems challenging, even after diagnosis.

aimTo explore how Norwegian GPs follow-up patients after a first diagnosis of a psychological problem at age 15-16 years. DESIGN AND

settingNationwide longitudinal, register-based study using claims data for all GPs in the national list patient system, and for adolescents born in 1993 and 1994 (

methodNational databases and registers were used to determine how many adolescents received a first diagnosis of a psychological problem in a GP consultation at age 15 or 16 years. Further consultations, collaborative contacts in primary care, and referrals to secondary care during the year after diagnosis were then identified and used as outcomes in regression analyses to investigate associations with initial diagnosis, parental education, and GP characteristics.

resultsIn total, 6809 (5.3%) adolescents received a first diagnosis of a psychological problem in a GP consultation at age 15 or 16 years. Internalising problems constituted 50.5% of initial diagnoses among females and 28.8% among males. Behaviour and attention problems accounted for 21.3% for females and 45.0% for males. In total, 46.6% of females and 39.9% of males had ≥1 follow-up consultation, and 32.8% of females and 27.0% of males were referred to secondary care. GPs reported primary care collaboration for 22.1% of females and 19.1% of males. GPs with larger patient lists had higher referral rates, but collaborated less within primary care. Males with a male GP had more follow-up consultations than males with a female GP.

conclusionGP follow-up after diagnosing psychological problems among adolescents is limited, but predominantly comprised referrals and some multidisciplinary cooperation. GP follow-up consultations should be studied more thoroughly, and the role of GPs warrants further policy discussions.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAdolescentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleMental DisordersNorwayOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychology, AdolescentReferral and Consultationadolescentadolescent psychologycollaborationconsultationgeneral practice

Identifiers

PMID30297437
PMCPMC6193785
OpenAlexW2895159111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.