Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297436›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Professional resilience in GPs working in areas of socioeconomic deprivation: a qualitative study in primary care.

Eleanor Eley, Ben Jackson, Chris Burton, Elizabeth Walton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Main Features of Resilience in Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Article
  13. The professional resilience of mid-career GPs in the UK: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Jumping in at the Deep End: supporting young GPs working in deprivation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The resilient general practice: working as a pack.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  19. Are we propagating the inverse care law as GPs?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  20. The resilient general practice: working as a pack.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor EleyAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Ben JacksonAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Chris BurtonAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Elizabeth WaltonAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield and The Whitehouse Surgery, Sheffield.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs working in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation face particular challenges, and are at increased risk of professional burnout. Understanding how GPs working in such areas perceive professional resilience is important in order to recruit and retain a GP workforce in these areas.

aimTo understand how GPs working in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation consider professional resilience. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study of GPs practising in deprived areas within one primary care region of England.

methodIn total, 14 individual interviews and one focus group of eight participants were undertaken, with sampling to data saturation. A framework approach was used for data analysis.

resultsParticipants described three key themes relating to resilience. First, resilience was seen as involving flexibility and adaptability. This involved making trade-offs in order to keep going, even if this was imperfect. Second, resilience was enacted through teams rather than through individual strength. Third, resilience required the integration of personal and professional values rather than keeping the two separate. This dynamic adaptive view, with an emphasis on the importance of individuals within teams rather than in isolation, contrasts with the discourse of resilience as a personal characteristic, which should be strengthened at the individual level.

conclusionProfessional resilience is about more than individual strength. Policies to promote professional resilience, particularly in settings such as areas of high socioeconomic deprivation, must recognise the importance of flexibility, adaptability, working as teams, and successful integration between work and personal values.

Indexed as

Poverty AreasPrimary Health CareResilience, PsychologicalAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalEnglandFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchState MedicineWorkplaceburnoutgeneral practitionersprimary health carequalitative researchsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID30297436
PMCPMC6255227
OpenAlexW2895113991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.