Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297406›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Selection and gene flow shape genomic islands that control floral guides.

Hugo Tavares, Annabel Whibley, David L Field, Desmond Bradley, Matthew Couchman, Lucy Copsey, Joane Elleouet, Monique Burrus, Christophe Andalo, Miaomiao Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic analysis reveals a cryptic pangolin species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic factors predict hybrid formation in the British flora.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hugo TavaresDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2726
Annabel WhibleyDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
David L FieldInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Desmond BradleyDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Matthew CouchmanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Lucy CopseyDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Joane ElleouetDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Monique BurrusLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174 CNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse Cédex 9, France.
Christophe AndaloLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174 CNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse Cédex 9, France.
Miaomiao LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2132-6168
Qun LiState Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China.
Yongbiao XueState Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China.
Alexandra B RebochoDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom.
Nicolas H BartonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria; Nick.Barton@ist.ac.at enrico.coen@jic.ac.uk.
Enrico CoenDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, NR4 7UH Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom; Nick.Barton@ist.ac.at enrico.coen@jic.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G009325/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/00000152Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes of closely-related species or populations often display localized regions of enhanced relative sequence divergence, termed genomic islands. It has been proposed that these islands arise through selective sweeps and/or barriers to gene flow. Here, we genetically dissect a genomic island that controls flower color pattern differences between two subspecies of

Indexed as

AntirrhinumChromosomes, PlantColorFlowersGene FlowGenetic SpeciationGenome, PlantGenomic IslandsSelection, GeneticAntirrhinumgenomic islandhybrid zoneselective sweepspeciation

Identifiers

PMID30297406
PMCPMC6205484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.