Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297400›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Neural reactivation in parietal cortex enhances memory for episodically linked information.

Tanya R Jonker, Halle Dimsdale-Zucker, Maureen Ritchey, Alex Clarke, Charan Ranganath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural and computational evidence for a predictive learning account of the testing effect.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. No evidence of a visual testing effect for novel, meaningless objects.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The testing effect for visual materials depends on preexisting knowledge.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Contextual Expectations Shape Cortical Reinstatement of Sensory Representations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Understanding associative false memories in aging using multivariate analyses.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  20. Selective memory retrieval can revive forgotten memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanya R JonkerCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; tanyarjonker@gmail.com.
Halle Dimsdale-ZuckerCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Maureen RitcheyDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467.
Alex ClarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-5229
Charan RanganathCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Funding

Emotional modulation of human memory processes and corticohippocampal systemsK99MH103401 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RITCHEY, MAUREEN · 2015 to 2016
$116k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH103401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remembering is a complex process that involves recalling specific details, such as who you were with when you celebrated your last birthday, as well as contextual information, such as the place where you celebrated. It is well established that the act of remembering enhances long-term retention of the retrieved information, but the neural and cognitive mechanisms that drive memory enhancement are not yet understood. One possibility is that the process of remembering results in reactivation of the broader episodic context. Consistent with this idea, in two experiments, we found that multiple retrieval attempts enhanced long-term retention of both the retrieved object and the nontarget object that shared scene context, compared with a restudy control. Using representational similarity analysis of fMRI data in experiment 2, we found that retrieval resulted in greater neural reactivation of both the target objects and contextually linked objects compared with restudy. Furthermore, this reactivation occurred in a network of medial and lateral parietal lobe regions that have been linked to episodic recollection. The results demonstrate that retrieving a memory can enhance retention of information that is linked in the broader event context and the hippocampus and a posterior medial network of parietal cortical areas (also known as the Default Network) play complementary roles in supporting the reactivation of episodically linked information during retrieval.

Indexed as

Brain MappingFemaleHippocampusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, EpisodicMental RecallNerve NetParietal LobeReaction TimeTemporal Lobememory enhancementreactivationreinstatementretrieval

Identifiers

PMID30297400
PMCPMC6205442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.