Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30297135›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Effect of an Intrinsically Disordered Plant Stress Protein on the Properties of Water.

Luisa A Ferreira, Alicyia Walczyk Mooradally, Boris Zaslavsky, Vladimir N Uversky, Steffen P Graether

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomolecular condensates-Prerequisites for anhydrobiosis?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Crowding in Anhydrobiosis.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Role of Aqueous Media in Macromolecular Crowding.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Luisa A FerreiraCleveland Diagnostics, Cleveland, Ohio.
Alicyia Walczyk MooradallyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Boris ZaslavskyCleveland Diagnostics, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: boris.zaslavsky@cleveland-diagnostics.com.
Vladimir N UverskyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Institute for Biological Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russian Federation. Electronic address: vuversky@health.usf.edu.
Steffen P GraetherDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: graether@uoguelph.ca.
University of Guelph · CAUSF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dehydrins are plant proteins that are able to protect plants from various forms of dehydrative stress such as drought, cold, and high salinity. Dehydrins can prevent enzymes from losing activity after freeze/thaw treatments. Previous studies had suggested that the dehydrins function by a molecular shield effect, essentially preventing a denatured enzyme from aggregating with another enzyme. Therefore, the larger the dehydrin, the larger the shield and theoretically the more effective the protection. Although this relationship holds for smaller dehydrins, it fails to explain why larger dehydrins are less efficient than would be predicted from their size. Using solvatochromic dyes to probe the solvent features of water, we first confirm that the dehydrins do not bind the dyes, which would interfere with interpretation of the data. We then show that the dehydrins have an effect on three solvent properties of water (dipolarity/polarizability, hydrogen-bond donor acidity and hydrogen-bond acceptor basicity), which can contribute to the protective mechanism of these proteins. Interpretation of these data suggests that although polyethylene glycol and dehydrins have similar protective effects, dehydrins may more efficiently modify the hydrogen-bonding ability of bulk water to prevent enzyme denaturation. This possibly explains why dehydrins recover slightly more enzyme activity than polyethylene glycol.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsPlant ProteinsWaterIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsPlant ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID30297135
PMCPMC6224673
OpenAlexW2892491314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.