ReviewCurrent problems in cancer2018
Advanced imaging modalities to detect cardiotoxicity.
Review in Current problems in cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cardio-Oncology Imaging for Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer: mechanisms, diagnostic advances, and emerging protective strategies.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Review
- Left Atrial Strain-Current Review of Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Quantitative assessment of radiotherapy-induced myocardial damage using MRI: a systematic review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence opportunities in cardio-oncology: Overview with spotlight on electrocardiography.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Quantitative assessment of intra- and inter-modality deformable image registration of the heart, left ventricle, and thoracic aorta on longitudinal 4D-CT and MR images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Chemotherapy-induced Cardiac18F-FDG Uptake in Patients with Lymphoma: An Early Metabolic Index of Cardiotoxicity?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Review
- Cardiovascular Toxicities of CAR T-cell Therapy.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Metabolic Changes Precede Radiation-Induced Cardiac Remodeling in Beagles: Using NoninvasiveJournal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Transplantation for chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy-case series and review of current practice.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in cancer treatments have significantly improved survival rates, reemphasizing the focus on reducing the potential complications associated with some therapies. Cardiovascular disease associated with chemotherapies is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Early detection of cardiotoxicity improves cardiac outcomes among cancer patients. The review will focus on imaging modalities used to assess cardiotoxicity - the cardiovascular consequences of chemotherapies. The review will discuss the benefits and limitations associated with each technique, as well as the guidelines available to help identify at risk patients. We will discuss novel techniques that may help detect earlier signs of cardiotoxicity, directing management that may improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.