Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296932›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2018

First year experiences with a palliative out-patients structure for patients with COPD: a qualitative study of health professionals' expectations and experiences.

Dorthe Gaby Bove, Marie Lavesen, Maria Omel Jellington, Kristoffer Bastrup-Madsen Marsaa, Suzanne Forsyth Herling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorthe Gaby BoveEmergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjælland, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark. dorthe.gaby.bove.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4407-0225
Marie LavesenDepartment of Pulmonary & Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjælland, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
Maria Omel JellingtonDepartment of Pulmonary & Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjælland, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
Kristoffer Bastrup-Madsen MarsaaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Suzanne Forsyth HerlingNeuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Section 2091, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve the care of patients with advanced COPD and be able to address their palliative needs a new outpatient organization (CAPTAIN) was developed and implemented. CAPTAIN was inspired by best practice and existing guidelines and changed the traditional organization of an outpatient structure including the roles of nurses and doctors. Only sparse knowledge exists of the health professionals' expectations and experiences to organizational changes in an outpatient setting. This insight is necessary as health professionals are key stakeholders in implementing new structures and successfully transforming knowledge into practice. The aim of this study was to explore the health professionals' expectations and experiences of a new palliative out-patients structure for patients with advanced COPD.

methodsThe design was interpretive description as described by Thorne. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with pulmonary nurses, pulmonary doctors and municipality nurses from 2014 to 2016.

resultsThe overall theme was dualism. Both nurses and doctors were pending between aspiration and concern in their expectations to the new structure, meanwhile their actual experiences were pending between perceived gain and improvements versus consequences with the new structure. Nurses' and doctors' existing practice was altered and the new structure required new ways for them to cooperate and ways in which skills from each profession were most efficiently utilized.

conclusionNurses and doctors considered the new structure as a quality boost and it fulfilled their hope of improving the quality of care offered to patients with advanced COPD, however with increased work-related stress as a derived consequence.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelPalliative CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTerminal CareAdultDenmarkDisease ProgressionFemaleHealth Care RationingHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleNursesOrganizational InnovationPhysiciansDualismInterpretive descriptionMultidisciplinarityNon-malignant palliative careOrganizational changesQualitative researchResource utilization

Identifiers

PMID30296932
PMCPMC6176513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.