Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296493›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms2019

It's complicated… m

Christina M Fitzsimmons, Pedro J Batista

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of N6-methyladenosine (mFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Recent advances in functional annotation and prediction of the epitranscriptome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  18. Corrigendum: Roles of N6-Methyladenosine (mFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M FitzsimmonsLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Pedro J BatistaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: pedro.batista@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Regulation of RNA biogenesis and function by RNA modificationsZIABC011766 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DE OLIVEIRA RODRIGUES BATISTA, PEDRO · 2017 to 2025
$10.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular function relies on multiple pathways that are coordinated to ensure the proper execution of gene expression networks. Failure to coordinate the multiple programs active in the cell can have catastrophic consequences and lead to diseases such as cancer. At the post-transcriptional level, RNA modifications play important roles in the regulation of gene expression. N6-methyladenosine (m

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalAdenineAnimalsHumans6-methyladenineAdenineCancerEpitranscriptomeGene regulationm(6)A

Identifiers

PMID30296493
PMCPMC6401303
OpenAlexW2895768487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.