Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296435›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2019

Levels of the Autophagy-Related 5 Protein Affect Progression and Metastasis of Pancreatic Tumors in Mice.

Kivanc Görgülü, Kalliope N Diakopoulos, Jiaoyu Ai, Benjamin Schoeps, Derya Kabacaoglu, Angeliki-Faidra Karpathaki, Katrin J Ciecielski, Ezgi Kaya-Aksoy, Dietrich A Ruess, Alexandra Berninger and 24 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The multiple roles of autophagy in uveal melanoma and the microenvironment.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Autophagy: The convergence point of aging and cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Novel Insights into The Roles of NInternational journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Kivanc GörgülüKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Kalliope N DiakopoulosKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Jiaoyu AiKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin SchoepsInstitute of Molecular Immunology and Experimental Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Derya KabacaogluKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Angeliki-Faidra KarpathakiKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Katrin J CiecielskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Ezgi Kaya-AksoyKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Dietrich A RuessKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra BerningerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Marlena KowalskaKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Marija StevanovicKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sonja M WörmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas WartmannKlinik für Chirurgie Bereich Experimentelle Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Yue ZhaoKlinik für Chirurgie Bereich Experimentelle Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Walter HalangkKlinik für Chirurgie Bereich Experimentelle Operative Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Svetlana VoroninaInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alexey TepikinInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anna Melissa SchlitterInstitute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany and German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany and German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany; Comparative Experimental Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Anna ArtatiInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Genome Analysis Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Jerzy AdamskiInstitute of Experimental Genetics, Genome Analysis Centre, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Institute for Diabetes and Cancer, German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany; Lehrstuhl für Experimentelle Genetik, Technische Universität München, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Michaela AichlerResearch Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Axel WalchResearch Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Martin JastrochHelmholtz Diabetes Center and German Diabetes Center, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Götz HartlebenInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christos S MantzorosDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany and German Cancer Consortium, Munich, Germany.
Roland M SchmidKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Stephan HerzigInstitute for Diabetes and Cancer, German Center for Diabetes Research, Neuherberg, Germany.
Achim KrügerInstitute of Molecular Immunology and Experimental Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Bruno SainzDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Autónoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marina LesinaKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: marina.lesina@tum.de.
Hana AlgülKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: hana.alguel@mri.tum.de.
TUM Klinikum · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DETechnical University of Munich · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GBBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergo autophagy, but its effects vary with tumor stage and genetic factors. We investigated the consequences of varying levels of the autophagy related 5 (Atg5) protein on pancreatic tumor formation and progression.

methodsWe generated mice that express oncogenic Kras in primary pancreatic cancer cells and have homozygous disruption of Atg5 (A5;Kras) or heterozygous disruption of Atg5 (A5

resultsA5

conclusionsIn mice that express oncogenic Kras in pancreatic cells, heterozygous disruption of Atg5 and reduced protein levels promotes tumor development, whereas homozygous disruption of Atg5 blocks tumorigenesis. Therapeutic strategies to alter autophagy in PDAC should consider the effects of ATG5 levels to avoid the expansion of resistant and highly aggressive cells.

Indexed as

AutophagyCell MovementAnimalsAutophagy-Related Protein 5Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCathepsinsCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, rasHeterozygoteHomozygoteMice, KnockoutPancreatic NeoplasmsSignal TransductionAtg5 protein, mouseAutophagy-Related Protein 5CathepsinsAtg5 LevelsCa(2+)CathepsinsMitochondriaPancreatic Carcinogenesis

Identifiers

PMID30296435
OpenAlexW2894759458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.