Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296430›Full record

ArticleBrain research2019

Long-term deficits in risky decision-making after traumatic brain injury on a rat analog of the Iowa gambling task.

Trinity K Shaver, Jenny E Ozga, Binxing Zhu, Karen G Anderson, Kris M Martens, Cole Vonder Haar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Statistical power and false positive rates for interdependent outcomes are strongly influenced by test type: Implications for behavioral neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trinity K ShaverDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jenny E OzgaDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Binxing ZhuDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Karen G AndersonDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Kris M MartensDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Cole Vonder HaarDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. Electronic address: cole.vonderhaar@mail.wvu.edu.

Funding

West Virginia University Stroke COBREP20GM109098 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI HRUSKA, MARTIN · 2014 to 2024
$24.5M
Dopamine modulation for the treatment of chronic dysfunction due to traumatic brain injuryR01NS110905 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI VONDER HAAR, COLE · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109098NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects 2.8 million people annually in the United States, with significant populations suffering from ongoing cognitive dysfunction. Impairments in decision-making can have major implications for patients and their caregivers, often enduring for years to decades, yet are rarely explored in experimental TBI. In the current study, the Rodent Gambling Task (RGT), an Iowa Gambling Task analog, was used to assess risk-based decision-making and motor impulsivity after TBI. During testing, rats chose between options associated with different probabilities of reinforcement (sucrose) or punishment (timeout). To determine effects of TBI on learned behaviors versus the learning process, rats were trained either before, or after, a bilateral frontal controlled cortical impact TBI, and then assessed for 12 weeks. To evaluate the degree to which monoamine systems, such as dopamine, were affected by TBI, rats were given an amphetamine challenge, and behavior recorded. Injury immediately and chronically decreased optimal decision-making, and biased rats towards both riskier, and safer (but suboptimal) choices, regardless of prior learning history. TBI also increased motor impulsivity across time, reflecting ongoing neural changes. Despite these similarities in trained and acquisition rats, those that learned the task after injury demonstrated reduced effects of amphetamine on optimal decision-making, suggesting a lesser role of monoamines in post-injury learning. Amphetamine also dose-dependently reduced motor impulsivity in injured rats. This study opens up the investigation of psychiatric-like dysfunction in animal models of TBI and tasks such as the RGT will be useful in identifying therapeutics for the chronic post-injury period.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrain Injuries, TraumaticCentral Nervous System StimulantsDecision MakingDisease Models, AnimalImpulsive BehaviorMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, Long-EvansRisk-TakingAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsAmphetamineBehaviorcFosPlasticityRodent gambling task

Identifiers

PMID30296430
PMCPMC6339846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.