ArticleThe Permanente journal2018
Using Neighborhood-Level Census Data to Predict Diabetes Progression in Patients with Laboratory-Defined Prediabetes.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and travel time to diabetes prevention programs in Maryland.Health & place · 2025Article
- Health and Racial Disparities in Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence, Management, Policies, and Outcomes in the United States.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2024Article
- Investigation of predictors of severity of diabetes complications among hospitalized patients with diabetes in Florida, 2016-2019.BMC public health · 2023Article
- The Impact of Neighborhoods on Diabetes Risk and Outcomes: Centering Health Equity.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Uncovering heterogeneous cardiometabolic risk profiles in US adults: the role of social and behavioral determinants of health.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2023Article
- Article
- The Application of Community-Based Information from the American Community Survey in a Large Integrated Health Care Organization.The Permanente journal · 2020Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.Diabetes care · 2020Review
- Obesity and related conditions and risk of inflammatory breast cancer: a nested case-control study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
contextResearch on predictors of clinical outcomes usually focuses on the impact of individual patient factors, despite known relationships between neighborhood environment and health.
objectiveTo determine whether US census information on where a patient resides is associated with diabetes development among patients with prediabetes.
designRetrospective cohort study of all 157,752 patients aged 18 years or older from Kaiser Permanente Northern California with laboratory-defined prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose, 100 mg/dL-125 mg/dL, and/or glycated hemoglobin, 5.7%-6.4%). We assessed whether census data on education, income, and percentage of households receiving benefits through the US Department of Agriculture's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) was associated with diabetes development using logistic regression controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, blood glucose levels, and body mass index.
main outcome measureProgression to diabetes within 36 months.
resultsPatients were more likely to progress to diabetes if they lived in an area where less than 16% of adults had obtained a bachelor's degree or higher (odds ratio [OR] =1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.36), where median annual income was below $79,999 (OR = 1.16 95% CI = 1.03-1.31), or where SNAP benefits were received by 10% or more of households (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4).
conclusionArea-level socioeconomic and food assistance data predict the development of diabetes, even after adjusting for traditional individual demographic and clinical factors. Clinical interventions should take these factors into account, and health care systems should consider addressing social needs and community resources as a path to improving health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.