Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296284›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Establishment of five immortalized human ovarian surface epithelial cell lines via SV40 T antigen or HPV E6/E7 expression.

Ha-Yeon Shin, Wookyeom Yang, Eun-Ju Lee, Gwan Hee Han, Hanbyoul Cho, Doo Byung Chay, Jae-Hoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cell Immortality:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immortalization Reversibility in the Context of Cell Therapy Biosafety.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel immortalized human vocal fold epithelial cell line: In vitro tool for mucosal biology.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ha-Yeon ShinGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wookyeom YangGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Ju LeeGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gwan Hee HanGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanbyoul ChoGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Doo Byung ChayGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Hoon KimGangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-7065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cells are a critical cell source for ovarian cancer research; however, they are difficult to obtain and maintain under standard laboratory conditions in large quantities. The aim of this study was to generate immortalized HOSE (IHOSE) cells with maintained properties to the original cell source, thereby guaranteeing a sufficiently large cell quantity for ovarian cancer research.

methodsHOSE cells isolated from four non-cancer patients and five IHOSE cell lines were established by induction of HPV-E6/E7 expression or SV40 large T antigen using a lenti-viral system. Each of IHOSE cells was confirmed to be distinct by STR profiling. RNA-sequencing was used to compare gene expression profiles in HOSE, IHOSE and ovarian cancer cells.

resultsRNA-sequencing results revealed a stronger linear correlation in gene expression between IHOSE and HOSE cells (R2 = 0.9288) than between IHOSE or HOSE cells and ovarian cancer cells (R2 = 0.8562 and R2 = 0.7982, respectively). The gene expression pattern of 319 differentially expressed genes revealed minimal differences between HOSE and IHOSE cells, while a strong difference between ovarian cancer cells and HOSE or IHOSE cells was observed. Furthermore, the five IHOSE cell lines displayed morphological characteristics typical of epithelial cells but showed a lower level of EpCAM, CD133 and E-cadherin, as cancer stem marker, than ovarian cancer cells. Moreover, unlike cancer cells, IHOSE cells could not form colonies in the anchorage-independent soft agar growth assay.

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that five newly established IHOSE cell lines have characteristics of progenitor HOSE cells while exhibiting continuous growth, and thus, should be highly useful as control cells for ovarian cancer research.

Indexed as

Founder EffectAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCell Line, TransformedCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial CellsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansOncogene Proteins, ViralOvaryAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, humanE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16EPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion Moleculeoncogene protein E7, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsPROM1 protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30296284
PMCPMC6175519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.