ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2018
Dictionary Representations for Electrode Displacement Elastography.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Imaging of Liver Tumors before and after Microwave Ablation with Electrode Displacement Elastography.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- C-Elastography: In Vitro Feasibility Phantom Study.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Adaptation of Dictionary Learning for Electrode Displacement ElastographyAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020Article
- Physiological Motion Reduction Using Lagrangian Tracking for Electrode Displacement Elastography.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2020Article
- Two-dimensional ultrasound-computed tomography image registration for monitoring percutaneous hepatic intervention.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound electrode displacement elastography (EDE) has demonstrated the potential to monitor ablated regions in human patients after minimally invasive microwave ablation procedures. Displacement estimation for EDE is commonly plagued by decorrelation noise artifacts degrading displacement estimates. In this paper, we propose a global dictionary learning approach applied to denoising displacement estimates with an adaptively learned dictionary from EDE phantom displacement maps. The resulting algorithm is one that represents displacement patches sparsely if they contain low noise and averages remaining patches thereby denoising displacement maps while retaining important edge information. The results of dictionary-represented displacements presented with a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) with improved contrast, as well as improved phantom inclusion delineation when compared to initial displacements, median-filtered displacements, and spline smoothened displacements, respectively. In addition to visualized noise reduction, dictionary-represented displacements presented with the highest SNR, CNR, and improved contrast with values of 1.77, 4.56, and 4.35 dB, respectively, when compared to axial strain tensor images estimated using the initial displacements. Following EDE phantom imaging, we utilized dictionary representations from in vivo patient data, further validating efficacy. Denoising displacement estimates are a newer application for dictionary learning producing strong ablated region delineation with little degradation from denoising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.