ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
Separating Touching Cells Using Pixel Replicated Elliptical Shape Models.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Kolmogorov metric embedding for live cell microscopy signaling patterns.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- UNSEG: unsupervised segmentation of cells and their nuclei in complex tissue samples.Communications biology · 2024Article
- UNSEG: unsupervised segmentation of cells and their nuclei in complex tissue samples.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The Cluster Structure Function.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2023Article
- Microfeature Segmentation Algorithm for Biological Images Using Improved Density Peak Clustering.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most important and error-prone tasks in biological image analysis is the segmentation of touching or overlapping cells. Particularly for optical microscopy, including transmitted light and confocal fluorescence microscopy, there is often no consistent discriminative information to separate cells that touch or overlap. It is desired to partition touching foreground pixels into cells using the binary threshold image information only, and optionally incorporating gradient information. The most common approaches for segmenting touching and overlapping cells in these scenarios are based on the watershed transform. We describe a new approach called pixel replication for the task of segmenting elliptical objects that touch or overlap. Pixel replication uses the image Euclidean distance transform in combination with Gaussian mixture models to better exploit practically effective optimization for delineating objects with elliptical decision boundaries. Pixel replication improves significantly on commonly used methods based on watershed transforms, or based on fitting Gaussian mixtures directly to the thresholded image data. Pixel replication works equivalently on both 2-D and 3-D image data, and naturally combines information from multi-channel images. The accuracy of the proposed technique is measured using both the segmentation accuracy on simulated ellipse data and the tracking accuracy on validated stem cell tracking results extracted from hundreds of live-cell microscopy image sequences. Pixel replication is shown to be significantly more accurate compared with other approaches. Variance relationships are derived, allowing a more practically effective Gaussian mixture model to extract cell boundaries for data generated from the threshold image using the uniform elliptical distribution and from the distance transform image using the triangular elliptical distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.