ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019
Comparative metagenomics of the gut microbiota in wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea).
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects and Microbiota Changes Following Oral Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Capsules in Canine with Chronic Enteropathy After Parvovirus Infection: Case Report.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Gut Bacteria of Four Waterbirds Species in Taolimiao-Alashan Nur (T-A Nur) in Erdos Relic Gull National Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia, China.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Breed-specific gut microbiota and enterotype divergence in Chinese indigenous ducks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenomic analysis of gut microbiome and resistome of Whooper and Black Swans: a one health perspective.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Relict Gull (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Comparative Analyses of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Jejunum Microbiota of Pigs in Different Areas.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Effect of sex on the gut microbiota characteristics of passerine migratory birds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Differences in Fecal Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance between Captive and Free-Range Sika Deer under the Same Exposure of Antibiotic Anthelmintics.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Diet-induced microbiome shifts of sympatric overwintering birds.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Flexibility and resilience of great tit (Parus major) gut microbiomes to changing diets.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Six Bird Species.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Effects of Sex and Diet on Gut Microbiota of Farmland-Dependent Wintering Birds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Comparative analysis of the composition and function of fecal-gut bacteria in captive juvenile Crocodylus siamensis between healthy and anorexic individuals.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Comparative metagenomics of the gut microbiota in wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea).MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut microbiome contributes to host health by maintaining homeostasis, increasing digestive efficiency, and facilitating the development of immune system. Wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea), migrating along the central Asian flyway, appear to be one of the most popular species in the rare birds rearing industries of China. However, the structure and function of the gut microbial communities associated with these two bird species remain poorly understood. Here, for the first time, we compared gut metagenomes from greylag geese to ruddy shelducks and investigated the similarities and differences between these two bird species in detail. Taxonomic classifications revealed the top three bacterial phyla, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria, in both greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. Furthermore, between the two species, 12 bacterial genera were found to be more abundant in ruddy shelducks and 41 genera were significantly higher in greylag geese. A total of 613 genera (approximately 70%) were found to be present in both groups. Metabolic categories related to carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and glycan biosynthesis and metabolism were significantly more abundant in ruddy shelducks, while greylag geese were enriched in nucleotide metabolism and energy metabolism. The herbivorous greylag geese gut microbiota harbored more carbohydrate-active enzymes than omnivorous ruddy shelducks. In our study, a range of antibiotic resistance categories were also identified in the gut microbiota of greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. In addition to providing a better understanding of the composition and function of wild birds gut microbiome, this comparative study provides reference values of the artificial domestication of these birds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.