Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30296008›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019

Comparative metagenomics of the gut microbiota in wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea).

Wen Wang, Sisi Zheng, Laixing Li, Yongsheng Yang, Yingbao Liu, Aizhen Wang, Kirill Sharshov, Yao Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diet-induced microbiome shifts of sympatric overwintering birds.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wen WangState Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-7929
Sisi ZhengNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.
Laixing LiNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.
Yongsheng YangNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.
Yingbao LiuCollege of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Aizhen WangCollege of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.
Kirill SharshovResearch Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Yao LiCollege of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xi'ning, Qinghai, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNQinghai University · CNScientific Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine · RUYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome contributes to host health by maintaining homeostasis, increasing digestive efficiency, and facilitating the development of immune system. Wild greylag geese (Anser anser) and ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea), migrating along the central Asian flyway, appear to be one of the most popular species in the rare birds rearing industries of China. However, the structure and function of the gut microbial communities associated with these two bird species remain poorly understood. Here, for the first time, we compared gut metagenomes from greylag geese to ruddy shelducks and investigated the similarities and differences between these two bird species in detail. Taxonomic classifications revealed the top three bacterial phyla, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Fusobacteria, in both greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. Furthermore, between the two species, 12 bacterial genera were found to be more abundant in ruddy shelducks and 41 genera were significantly higher in greylag geese. A total of 613 genera (approximately 70%) were found to be present in both groups. Metabolic categories related to carbohydrate metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and glycan biosynthesis and metabolism were significantly more abundant in ruddy shelducks, while greylag geese were enriched in nucleotide metabolism and energy metabolism. The herbivorous greylag geese gut microbiota harbored more carbohydrate-active enzymes than omnivorous ruddy shelducks. In our study, a range of antibiotic resistance categories were also identified in the gut microbiota of greylag geese and ruddy shelducks. In addition to providing a better understanding of the composition and function of wild birds gut microbiome, this comparative study provides reference values of the artificial domestication of these birds.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeAnimalsBacteriaChinaDucksGeeseMetagenomicsantibiotic resistance genescarbohydrate-active enzymesgreylag geesegut metagenomesruddy shelducks

Identifiers

PMID30296008
PMCPMC6528571
OpenAlexW2889658629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.