Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295851›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

The jPOST environment: an integrated proteomics data repository and database.

Yuki Moriya, Shin Kawano, Shujiro Okuda, Yu Watanabe, Masaki Matsumoto, Tomoyo Takami, Daiki Kobayashi, Yoshinori Yamanouchi, Norie Araki, Akiyasu C Yoshizawa and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update.Nucleic acids research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Top-down proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuki MoriyaDatabase Center for Life Science, Joint Support-Center for Data Science Research, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Kashiwa 277-0871, Japan.
Shin KawanoDatabase Center for Life Science, Joint Support-Center for Data Science Research, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Kashiwa 277-0871, Japan.
Shujiro OkudaNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Yu WatanabeNiigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Masaki MatsumotoMedical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Tomoyo TakamiMedical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Daiki KobayashiGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Yoshinori YamanouchiGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Norie ArakiGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Akiyasu C YoshizawaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TabataGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Mio IwasakiCenter for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Naoyuki SugiyamaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Satoshi TanakaTrans-IT, Kaminokawa 329-0607, Japan.
Susumu GotoDatabase Center for Life Science, Joint Support-Center for Data Science Research, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Kashiwa 277-0871, Japan.
Yasushi IshihamaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid progress is being made in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, yielding an increasing number of larger datasets with higher quality and higher throughput. To integrate proteomics datasets generated from various projects and institutions, we launched a project named jPOST (Japan ProteOme STandard Repository/Database, https://jpostdb.org/) in 2015. Its proteomics data repository, jPOSTrepo, began operations in 2016 and has accepted more than 10 TB of MS-based proteomics datasets in the past two years. In addition, we have developed a new proteomics database named jPOSTdb in which the published raw datasets in jPOSTrepo are reanalyzed using standardized protocol. jPOSTdb provides viewers showing the frequency of detected post-translational modifications, the co-occurrence of phosphorylation sites on a peptide and peptide sharing among proteoforms. jPOSTdb also provides basic statistical analysis tools to compare proteomics datasets.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinComputational BiologyData ManagementHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetJapanMass SpectrometryProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeProteomicsUser-Computer InterfaceProteome

Identifiers

PMID30295851
PMCPMC6324006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.