Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295811›Full record

Trial reportInflammatory bowel diseases2019

Fecal Calprotectin Responses Following Induction Therapy With Vedolizumab in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of GEMINI 1.

Walter Reinisch, Brian Bressler, Rebecca Curtis, Asit Parikh, Huyuan Yang, Maria Rosario, Arne Røseth, Silvio Danese, Brian Feagan, Bruce E Sands and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240168 (Drug Retention in Vedolizumab-treated Patients With Active UC After the Addition of Adjunct CurQD), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07240168 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Drug Retention in Vedolizumab-treated Patients With Active UC After the Addition of Adjunct CurQD: A Retrospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorEvinature Ltd.Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsUlcerative Colitis (UC)ArmsCurQD (Curcumin + QingDai combination)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modeling Endoscopic Improvement after Induction Treatment With Mesalamine in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Current Endpoints of Clinical Trials in Ulcerative Colitis: Are They Valid?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Walter ReinischMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Brian BresslerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Rebecca CurtisTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Asit ParikhTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Huyuan YangTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Maria RosarioTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Arne RøsethLovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Silvio DaneseIstituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy.
Brian FeaganRobarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, and the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Bruce E SandsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Philip GinsburgFrank H Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA.
Themistocles DassopoulosBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
James LewisCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jing XuTakeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Tim WyantCuris, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA.
Takeda (United States) · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCuris (United States) · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USLovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NOMedical University of Vienna · ATQuinnipiac University · USRobarts Clinical Trials · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), fecal calprotectin (FC) concentrations correlate with endoscopic inflammation evidence. This study investigated the effect of vedolizumab induction on FC concentrations and whether FC concentrations could be a reliable surrogate measure of disease status.

methodsData from the placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial GEMINI 1 were used to evaluate week-6 relationships between outcomes (including clinical remission, mucosal healing [MH], and endoscopic remission) and both absolute FC concentration values and relative FC concentration changes from baseline (%FC0-6). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by cross-tabulation; the value of week-6 FC concentration as surrogate biomarker was measured with Youden J statistic computed for various cut points.

resultsGEMINI 1 induction phase enrolled 895 patients. Fecal calprotectin concentration decreases were deeper in patients with clinical remission, MH, and/or endoscopic remission than in patients without. The best week-6 indicator of clinical or endoscopic remission in this data set was absolute FC concentration ≤150 µg/g. The surrogate biomarker values (based on areas under the curve) for the best-performing cut points (FC0-6 reduction >90%, FC ≤150 µg/g) were fair (range, 0.70-0.77, total population). More patients met the ≤150 µg/g cut point with vedolizumab than with placebo. Baseline FC concentrations were not correlated with clinical outcomes.

conclusionsFecal calprotectin concentration reductions were greater with vedolizumab induction than with placebo. Week-6 FC concentrations had only fair surrogate biomarker value for endoscopic status. Our data suggest that, while FC may reflect inflammatory burden, FC concentration after vedolizumab induction may not be a robust biomarker of mucosal inflammation.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeFecesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal AgentsHumansLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersGastrointestinal AgentsLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexvedolizumabcalprotectincolitisulcerativevedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30295811
PMCPMC6416826
OpenAlexW2895590704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.