ReviewGlobal change biology2019
Climate change opens new frontiers for marine species in the Arctic: Current trends and future invasion risks.
Review in Global change biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 201 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parasites of Arctic char (Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2026Article
- Faster Weight Growth in Invasive MosquitofishEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Biological invasions: a global assessment of geographic distributions, long-term trends, and data gaps.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Expanding Monitoring Capacity for Potential Invasive Species in Arctic Canada With Environmental DNA Metabarcoding.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Variation of thermal tolerance during northward range expansion in the invasive golden star tunicate,Conservation physiology · 2025Article
- Article
- The impacts of diet on cardiac performance under changing environments.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- Quantifying the probability of a successful marine bioinvasion due to source-destination risk factors.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Global warming scenarios for the Eastern Adriatic Sea indicate a higher risk of invasiveness of non-native marine organisms relative to current climate conditions.Marine life science & technology · 2024Article
- Human responses to climate change will likely determine the fate of biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Invasive investigation: uptake and transport of l-leucine in the gill epithelium of crustaceans.Conservation physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Expected contraction in the distribution ranges of demersal fish of high economic value in the Mediterranean and European Seas.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Niche breadth and biodiversity change derived from marine Amphipoda species off Iceland.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Environmental Drivers of an Intertidal Bryozoan Community in the Barents Sea: A Case Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Characterization of the abiotic drivers of abundance of nearshore Arctic fishes.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change and increased anthropogenic activities are expected to elevate the potential of introducing nonindigenous species (NIS) into the Arctic. Yet, the knowledge base needed to identify gaps and priorities for NIS research and management is limited. Here, we reviewed primary introduction events to each ecoregion of the marine Arctic realm to identify temporal and spatial patterns, likely source regions of NIS, and the putative introduction pathways. We included 54 introduction events representing 34 unique NIS. The rate of NIS discovery ranged from zero to four species per year between 1960 and 2015. The Iceland Shelf had the greatest number of introduction events (n = 14), followed by the Barents Sea (n = 11), and the Norwegian Sea (n = 11). Sixteen of the 54 introduction records had no known origins. The majority of those with known source regions were attributed to the Northeast Atlantic and the Northwest Pacific, 19 and 14 records, respectively. Some introduction events were attributed to multiple possible pathways. For these introductions, vessels transferred the greatest number of aquatic NIS (39%) to the Arctic, followed by natural spread (30%) and aquaculture activities (25%). Similar trends were found for introductions attributed to a single pathway. The phyla Arthropoda and Ochrophyta had the highest number of recorded introduction events, with 19 and 12 records, respectively. Recommendations including vector management, horizon scanning, early detection, rapid response, and a pan-Arctic biodiversity inventory are considered in this paper. Our study provides a comprehensive record of primary introductions of NIS for marine environments in the circumpolar Arctic and identifies knowledge gaps and opportunities for NIS research and management. Ecosystems worldwide will face dramatic changes in the coming decades due to global change. Our findings contribute to the knowledge base needed to address two aspects of global change-invasive species and climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.