Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295388›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2019

Climate change opens new frontiers for marine species in the Arctic: Current trends and future invasion risks.

Farrah T Chan, Keara Stanislawczyk, Anna C Sneekes, Alexander Dvoretsky, Stephan Gollasch, Dan Minchin, Matej David, Anders Jelmert, Jon Albretsen, Sarah A Bailey

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parasites of Arctic char (Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human responses to climate change will likely determine the fate of biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.

Farrah T ChanGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1062-6707
Keara StanislawczykGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Anna C SneekesWageningen Marine Research, Ijmuiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander DvoretskyMurmansk Marine Biological Institute, Kola Scientific Centre Russian Academy of Sciences, Murmansk, Russia.
Stephan GollaschGoConsult, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4410-6969
Dan MinchinMarine Organism Investigations, Killaloe, Ireland.
Matej DavidDr. Matej David Consult d.o.o., Izola, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0650-1730
Anders JelmertInstitute of Marine Research, Nordnes, Bergen, Norway.
Jon AlbretsenInstitute of Marine Research, Nordnes, Bergen, Norway.
Sarah A BaileyGreat Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-919X
Fisheries and Oceans Canada · CANorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NOKlaipėda University · LTRussian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Rijeka · HRWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and increased anthropogenic activities are expected to elevate the potential of introducing nonindigenous species (NIS) into the Arctic. Yet, the knowledge base needed to identify gaps and priorities for NIS research and management is limited. Here, we reviewed primary introduction events to each ecoregion of the marine Arctic realm to identify temporal and spatial patterns, likely source regions of NIS, and the putative introduction pathways. We included 54 introduction events representing 34 unique NIS. The rate of NIS discovery ranged from zero to four species per year between 1960 and 2015. The Iceland Shelf had the greatest number of introduction events (n = 14), followed by the Barents Sea (n = 11), and the Norwegian Sea (n = 11). Sixteen of the 54 introduction records had no known origins. The majority of those with known source regions were attributed to the Northeast Atlantic and the Northwest Pacific, 19 and 14 records, respectively. Some introduction events were attributed to multiple possible pathways. For these introductions, vessels transferred the greatest number of aquatic NIS (39%) to the Arctic, followed by natural spread (30%) and aquaculture activities (25%). Similar trends were found for introductions attributed to a single pathway. The phyla Arthropoda and Ochrophyta had the highest number of recorded introduction events, with 19 and 12 records, respectively. Recommendations including vector management, horizon scanning, early detection, rapid response, and a pan-Arctic biodiversity inventory are considered in this paper. Our study provides a comprehensive record of primary introductions of NIS for marine environments in the circumpolar Arctic and identifies knowledge gaps and opportunities for NIS research and management. Ecosystems worldwide will face dramatic changes in the coming decades due to global change. Our findings contribute to the knowledge base needed to address two aspects of global change-invasive species and climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAnimalsAquatic OrganismsArctic RegionsBiodiversityEcosystemIntroduced SpeciesRiskalien speciesaquacultureclimate warmingfisheriesinvasion pathwaysinvasive speciesknowledge gapnonindigenous speciesshippingvessels

Identifiers

PMID30295388
PMCPMC7379606
OpenAlexW2897807743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.