Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295320›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Rehabilitation Services Use of Older Adults According to Fall-Risk Screening Guidelines.

Nancy M Gell, Kushang V Patel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mobile Technology for Falls Prevention in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy M GellDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-8040
Kushang V PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-2876
University of Vermont · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The National Health and Trends StudyU01AG032947 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VICKI A. FREEDMAN, JENNIFER ANN SCHRACK · 2008 to 2026
$169.4M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize rehabilitation services use of older adults according to fall-risk classification based on screening guidelines.

designCross-sectional analysis of 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study.

settingStudy participants' homes.

participantsNational sample of 7,440 community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. MEASUREMENTS: In-person interviews and functional assessments. Based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries criteria, participants were classified as low, moderate, or high fall risk.

resultsTwenty-three percent of older adults classified as moderate fall-risk (n = 2602) and 40.6% of those at high fall-risk (n = 940) reported rehabilitation services use in the past year. Among older adults who reported rehabilitation services in the past year (n = 1,505), treatment to address falls was reported by 2.8%, 12.6%, and 34.7% of those classified with low, moderate, and high fall-risk, respectively (p < 0.001). Older adults with high fall-risk who did not receive rehabilitation services had significantly better self-reported physical capacity (p = 0.02) but comparable physical performance (all p's > 0.05) relative to those who received rehabilitation.

conclusionOlder adults at high risk for falls were significantly more likely to report rehabilitation services use compared to those with low and moderate risk of falling. The findings also indicate that there is low adherence to national clinical recommendations for rehabilitation services use in older adults vulnerable to falls-related injury. Among the high fall-risk group, those who did not receive rehabilitation services had similarly low physical function as compared with those who received rehabilitation, indicating potential unmet need to address physical impairments related to fall-risk. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:100-107, 2019.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Services for the AgedHumansIndependent LivingMaleMass ScreeningMedicarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicRehabilitationfallsgeriatricshealth servicesolder adultsrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30295320
PMCPMC6322948
OpenAlexW2896112878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.