Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295220›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio and conicity index to evaluate android fat excess in Brazilian children.

Mariana De Santis Filgueiras, Sarah Aparecida Vieira, Poliana Cristina de Almeida Fonseca, Patrícia Feliciano Pereira, Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro, Silvia Eloiza Priore, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini, Juliana Farias de Novaes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive performance of the waist-to-height ratio and the conicity index for diagnosing excess body fat in children.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Challenges in child and adolescent nutrition.Public health nutrition · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariana De Santis FilgueirasDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Sarah Aparecida VieiraDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Poliana Cristina de Almeida FonsecaDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Patrícia Feliciano PereiraDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Andréia Queiroz RibeiroDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Silvia Eloiza PrioreDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Sylvia do Carmo Castro FranceschiniDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Juliana Farias de NovaesDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Biological Sciences Center, Federal University of Viçosa, CEP 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the ability of anthropometric measurements to identify excess android fat and to propose cut-off points for excess central adiposity in children, according to age and sex.

designA cross-sectional study with children from a municipality of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to evaluate waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and conicity index (C-index) in estimating excess android fat by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

settingViçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. SUBJECTS: Children aged 4-9 years (n 788).

resultsOverweight prevalence was 29·1 % and android fat percentage was higher among girls. All central fat measurements were able to discriminate excess android fat in the age groups evaluated, especially WC and WHtR, with cut-off points showing good sensitivity and specificity overall.

conclusionsBecause these methods are easy to obtain and inexpensive, it is possible to use WC, WHtR and C-index in population surveys to evaluate central obesity. The proposed cut-off points showed satisfactory values of sensitivity and specificity and can be used in epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Waist CircumferenceWaist-Height RatioAbsorptiometry, PhotonBody Fat DistributionBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObesity, AbdominalPrevalenceReference ValuesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAbdominalAnthropometryChildObesityReceiver-operating characteristic curve

Identifiers

PMID30295220
PMCPMC10260534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.