Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30295145›Full record

ReviewTrends in hearing

The Noise Exposure Structured Interview (NESI): An Instrument for the Comprehensive Estimation of Lifetime Noise Exposure.

Hannah Guest, Rebecca S Dewey, Christopher J Plack, Samuel Couth, Garreth Prendergast, Warren Bakay, Deborah A Hall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05076344 (Understanding the Consequences of Recreational Noise Exposure), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05076344 completednot on this map

Understanding the Consequences of Recreational Noise Exposure

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2022 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsHearing Loss, Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and Validation of an Efficient and Safe Loud Music Exposure Paradigm.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah Guest1 Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-6663
Rebecca S Dewey2 Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, UK.
Christopher J Plack1 Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Samuel Couth1 Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Garreth Prendergast1 Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Warren Bakay1 Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Deborah A Hall3 NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-1452

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/L003589/1Medical Research Council MR/M023486/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lifetime noise exposure is generally quantified by self-report. The accuracy of retrospective self-report is limited by respondent recall but is also bound to be influenced by reporting procedures. Such procedures are of variable quality in current measures of lifetime noise exposure, and off-the-shelf instruments are not readily available. The Noise Exposure Structured Interview (NESI) represents an attempt to draw together some of the stronger elements of existing procedures and to provide solutions to their outstanding limitations. Reporting is not restricted to prespecified exposure activities and instead encompasses all activities that the respondent has experienced as noisy (defined based on sound level estimated from vocal effort). Changing exposure habits over time are reported by dividing the lifespan into discrete periods in which exposure habits were approximately stable, with life milestones used to aid recall. Exposure duration, sound level, and use of hearing protection are reported for each life period separately. Simple-to-follow methods are provided for the estimation of free-field sound level, the sound level emitted by personal listening devices, and the attenuation provided by hearing protective equipment. An energy-based means of combining the resulting data is supplied, along with a primarily energy-based method for incorporating firearm-noise exposure. Finally, the NESI acknowledges the need of some users to tailor the procedures; this flexibility is afforded, and reasonable modifications are described. Competency needs of new users are addressed through detailed interview instructions (including troubleshooting tips) and a demonstration video. Limited evaluation data are available, and future efforts at evaluation are proposed.

Indexed as

Self ReportCohort StudiesFemaleHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNeeds AssessmentNoise, OccupationalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexTime Factorsnoise-induced hearing lossoccupational noisepublic healthriskself-report

Identifiers

PMID30295145
PMCPMC6176535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.