ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2018
Developing informed consent materials for non-English-speaking participants: An analysis of four professional firm translations from English to Spanish.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and interpreting services must be considered across the lifecycle of clinical trials.Trials · 2026Article
- Article
- PPI in LifeMap-QUEST: an example of co-producing videos in different languages to support inclusion in a clinical study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Improving Informed Consent for English and Spanish Speakers in Clinical Trials.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Article
- Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025Article
- Examining Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Commercially Developed Patient Education Materials for Adults Living With Diabetes on the U.S./Mexico Border.Clinical nursing research · 2025Article
- "How Fluent Do I Need to Be to Say I'm Fluent?" Research Experiences of Communities that Speak Languages Other than English.Community health equity research & policy · 2025Article
- Why and how to collect representative study samples in educational neuroscience research.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Prevention and Care of COVID-19 Infection in Cincinnati Latinx Families: a Community-Based Convergent Mixed Methods Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Considerations When Designing and Implementing Pragmatic Clinical Trials That Include Older Hispanics.Ethnicity & disease · 2023Article
- Inclusion of Non-English-Speaking Participants in Pediatric Health Research: A Review.JAMA pediatrics · 2023Review
- Understanding perinatal patient's health preferences and patient-provider relationships to prevent congenital syphilis in California and Louisiana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Core outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy: a qualitative study with parents.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Article
- Opening doors to clinical trial participation among Hispanics: Lessons learned from the Spanish translation of ResearchMatch.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Improving Translation and Cultural Appropriateness of Spanish-Language Consent Materials for Biobanks.Ethics & human research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsAn increasing body of research is being conducted with non-English-speaking subjects. Study-related materials, including those essential for obtaining informed consent, must often be translated from English into other languages. In this study, we sought to examine the types of issues that may arise when consent materials are translated from English to Spanish.
methodsDrawing on expertise from five individuals associated with our research team, four of whom are native Spanish speakers of different dialects of Spanish, we crafted translations of our own consent materials for biobanking using a rigorous, multi-step process involving both forward and back translation. We then systematically compared our translations to those produced by four professional translation firms to identify potential concerns in our own and the professional translations.
resultsWe identified three primary types of problems of relevance for researchers conducting studies where translation of written information is required. These included nonequivalent registers (in particular, the introduction of more complicated language), errors of omission (reducing the clarity of the information), and changes that altered the substantive meaning of the information.
conclusionOur findings highlight the importance of working with translators who not only possess "textbook" knowledge of both languages but also an appreciation of the sociocultural factors that affect how people interpret and understand meaning. Moreover, translators who have a basic understanding of research are more likely to accurately convey essential research concepts. We describe a series of steps researchers can take that may help to improve the quality of translated materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.