ReviewClinical cardiology2019
The tetrafascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Escape Rhythm During Complete Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Conduction Disorders in the Setting of Acute STEMI.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- The Vectorcardiogram and the Main Dromotropic Disturbances.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Variant Angina with Spontaneously Documented Ischemia- and Tachycardia-induced "Lambda" Waves.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- The tetrafascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system.Clinical cardiology · 2019Review
- Left Septal Fascicular Block Following Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Journal of atrial fibrillationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existence of a tetrafascicular intraventricular conduction system remains debatable. A consensus statement ended up with some discrepancies and, despite agreeing on the possible existence of an anatomical left septal fascicle, the electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic characteristics of left septal fascicular block (LSFB) were not universally accepted. The most important criteria requested to confirm the existence of LSFB is its intermittent nature. So far, our group has published cases of transient ischemia-induced LSFB and phase 4 or bradycardia-dependent LSFB. Finally, anatomical, anatomopathological, histological, histopathological, electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic, body surface potential mapping, and electrophysiology studies support the fact that the left bundle branch divides into three fascicles or a "fan-like interconnected network."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.