Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30294882›Full record

ReviewPediatric blood & cancer2019

Understanding care and outcomes in adolescents and young adult with Cancer: A review of the AYA HOPE study.

Ashley Wilder Smith, Theresa Keegan, Ann Hamilton, Charles Lynch, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Stephen M Schwartz, Ikuko Kato, Rosemary Cress, Linda Harlan, AYA HOPE Study Collaborative Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing the multidisciplinary and multispecialty workforce and the systems needed to sustain high-quality care from diagnosis through long-term survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating Japan's cancer control activities: Findings from the third cancer patient experience survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ashley Wilder SmithOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9674-5717
Theresa KeeganUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Ann HamiltonKeck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-2308
Charles LynchUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Xiao-Cheng WuLSU Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Stephen M SchwartzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Ikuko KatoWayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Rosemary CressCancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, California.
Linda HarlanSpecial Volunteer, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
AYA HOPE Study Collaborative GroupOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00028NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00029NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00030NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00032NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00034NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00035NCI NIH HHS N01PC-2010-00140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, adolescents and young adults (AYA) diagnosed with cancer have been an understudied population, and their unique care experiences, needs, and outcomes were not well understood. Thus, 10 years ago, the National Cancer Institute supported the fielding of the Adolescent and Young Adult Health Outcomes and Patient Experiences (AYA HOPE) study to address this gap. We recruited individuals diagnosed at ages 15 to 39 with germ cell, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and sarcoma from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries into the first multicenter population-based study of medical care, physical, and mental health outcomes for AYAs with cancer in the United States. This review of the 17 published manuscripts showed low awareness of clinical trials and substantial impact of cancer on financial burden, education and work, relationships and family planning, and physical and mental health. It highlights the feasibility of a longitudinal population-based study and key lessons learned for research on AYAs with cancer in and beyond the United States.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentPsychotherapyQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInsurance CoverageMaleNeoplasmsRegistriesSEER ProgramSurvivorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultadolescentcancer carehealth outcomesquality of lifeyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID30294882
PMCPMC7239374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.