Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30294780›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2019

The effect of political control on financial performance, structure, and outcomes of US nursing homes.

Carl Rudolf Blankart, Andrew D Foster, Vincent Mor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carl Rudolf BlankartKPM Center for Public Management, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6719-0038
Andrew D FosterDepartment of Economics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-7558
Vincent MorDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-1267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of partisan political control on financial performance, structure, and outcomes of for-profit and not-for-profit US nursing homes. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingNineteen-year panel (1996-2014) of state election outcomes, financial performance data from nursing home cost reports, operational and aggregate resident characteristics from OSCAR of 13 737 nursing homes. STUDY

designA linear panel model was estimated to identify the effect of Democratic and Republican political control on next year's outcomes. Nursing home outcomes were defined as yearly facility revenues, expenses, and profits; the number of Medicaid, Medicare, and private-pay residents; staffing levels; and selected resident outcomes. PRINCIPAL

findingsDemocratic political control leads to an increase in financial flows to for-profit nursing homes, boosting profits without producing observable improvements in resident outcomes. Republican political control leads to lower revenues and profits of for-profit nursing homes. A shift from Medicaid to more profitable private-pay residents following Republican political control is observed for all nursing homes. Financial performance of not-for-profit nursing homes is not significantly affected by changes in political control.

conclusionPolitical control of the two legislative chambers-but not of the governorship-shapes the structure of the nursing home industry as seen in provider behavior.

Indexed as

PoliticsFederal GovernmentFinancial ManagementHomes for the AgedHumansMedicareNursing HomesOwnershipQuality of Health CareUnited StatesMedicaidpolitical controlpublic spending

Identifiers

PMID30294780
PMCPMC6338305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.