ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2018
Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-function relationships across scales: implications for atlases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Environmental effects on brain functional networks in a juvenile twin population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Principles and open questions in functional brain network reconstruction.Human brain mapping · 2021Review
- Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Exploring distinct default mode and semantic networks using a systematic ICA approach.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- Characterizing Rapid Fluctuations of Resting State Functional Connectivity in Demyelinating, Neurodegenerative, and Psychiatric Conditions: From Static to Time-Varying Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Regions of Interest as nodes of dynamic functional brain networks.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The properties of functional brain networks strongly depend on how their nodes are chosen. Commonly, nodes are defined by Regions of Interest (ROIs), predetermined groupings of fMRI measurement voxels. Earlier, we demonstrated that the functional homogeneity of ROIs, captured by their
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.