ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2018
Defensive medicine: It is time to finally slow down an epidemic.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptions of Medical Malpractice Liability and Informed Consent Among Hospital Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The crisis of internal medicine in Italy: responsibility without authority.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and obstetric outcomes of dengue fever in pregnancy: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices of physicians on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric surgery in China: a descriptive study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Medical education in low- and middle-income countries must be innovated without neglecting its foundational principles.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The current state of defensive medicine and its association with empathy: a cross-sectional study among graduate students in Guangxi, China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Navigating the landscape of legal medicine: a 4-year analysis of forensic consultations in an Italian hospital.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Not too sick, not too well: reducing the diagnostic void in pediatric emergency medicine.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- The Chinese version of Defensive Medicine Scale (DMS): reliability and validity test among physicians.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Modeling European health systems: an ideal chain of services.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- The influence of fears of perceived legal consequences on general practitioners' practice in relation to defensive medicine - a cross-sectional survey in Germany.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Defensive medicine practices as a result of malpractice claims and workplace physical violence: a cross-sectional study from Egypt.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Defensive medicine through the lens of the managerial perspective: a literature review.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Collateral Victims of Defensive Medical Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Defensive Medicine in the Context of the Indian Health System.Indian pediatrics · 2022Article
- Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among Patients of Primary Healthcare Services: Northeast Portugal.Portuguese journal of public health · 2022Article
- Defensive medicine in Danish general practice. Types of defensive actions and reasons for practicing defensively.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2021Article
- A Choosing Wisely top-5 list to support general practitioners in Austria.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defensive medicine is widespread and practiced the world over, with serious consequences for patients, doctors, and healthcare costs. Even students and residents are exposed to defensive medicine practices and taught to take malpractice liability into consideration when making clinical decisions. Defensive medicine is generally thought to stem from physicians' perception that they can easily be sued by patients or their relatives who seek compensation for presumed medical errors. However, in our view the growth of defensive medicine should be seen in the context of larger changes in the conception of medicine that have taken place in the last few decades, undermining the patient-physician trust, which has traditionally been the main source of professional satisfaction for physicians. These changes include the following: time directly spent with patients has been overtaken by time devoted to electronic health records and desk work; family doctors have played a progressively less central role; clinical reasoning is being replaced by guidelines and algorithms; the public at large and a number of young physicians tend to believe that medicine is a perfect science rather than an imperfect art, as it continues to be; and modern societies do not tolerate the inevitable morbidity and mortality. To finally reduce the increasing defensive behavior of doctors around the world, the decriminalization of medical errors and the assurance that they can be dealt with in civil courts or by medical organizations in all countries could help but it would not suffice. Physicians and surgeons should be allowed to spend the time they need with their patients and should give clinical reasoning the importance it deserves. The institutions should support the doctors who have experienced adverse patient events, and the media should stop reporting with excessive evidence presumed medical errors and subject physicians to "public trials" before they are eventually judged in court.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.