ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018
Producing 3D Biomimetic Nanomaterials for Musculoskeletal System Regeneration.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Design, Fabrication, and Future Applications.ACS polymers Au · 2026Review
- Nanotechnological Strategies to Promote Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Approaches for the Design and Fabrication of Bone-to-Soft Tissue Interfaces.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023Review
- Triphasic 3D In Vitro Model of Bone-Tendon-Muscle Interfaces to Study Their Regeneration.Cells · 2023Article
- Mussel-Based Biomimetic Strategies in Musculoskeletal Disorder Treatment: From Synthesis Principles to Diverse Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Nanofiber scaffolds based on extracellular matrix for articular cartilage engineering: A perspective.Nanotheranostics · 2023Review
- The Study of 3D Printing-Assisted Electrospinning Technology in Producing Tissue Regeneration Polymer-Fibroin Scaffold for Ureter Repair.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
- Biochemical Aspects of Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering; from Basic Science to Regenerative Medicine.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Review
- Novel Nano-Engineered Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- New Insights into the Application of 3D-Printing Technology in Hernia Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Electrospun Polymers in Cartilage Engineering-State of Play.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- 3D Printing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix to Design Biomimetic Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.BioMed research international · 2020Review
- A Novel Fabrication of Dose-Dependent Injectable Curcumin Biocomposite Hydrogel System Anesthetic Delivery Method for Care and Management of Musculoskeletal Pain.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human musculoskeletal system is comprised mainly of connective tissues such as cartilage, tendon, ligaments, skeletal muscle, and skeletal bone. These tissues support the structure of the body, hold and protect the organs, and are responsible of movement. Since it is subjected to continuous strain, the musculoskeletal system is prone to injury by excessive loading forces or aging, whereas currently available treatments are usually invasive and not always effective. Most of the musculoskeletal injuries require surgical intervention facing a limited post-surgery tissue regeneration, especially for widespread lesions. Therefore, many tissue engineering approaches have been developed tackling musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. Materials are designed to meet the chemical and mechanical requirements of the native tissue three-dimensional (3D) environment, thus facilitating implant integration while providing a good reabsorption rate. With biological systems operating at the nanoscale, nanoengineered materials have been developed to support and promote regeneration at the interprotein communication level. Such materials call for a great precision and architectural control in the production process fostering the development of new fabrication techniques. In this mini review, we would like to summarize the most recent advances in 3D nanoengineered biomaterials for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration, with especial emphasis on the different techniques used to produce them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.