ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Influence of Different Reference Databases on Categorization of Bone Mineral Density: A Study on Rural Postmenopausal Women from Southern India.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimation of T scores with Hologic using NatIve vs. Caucasian data in IndiAns (ETHNICA): a single center retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Trabecular Bone Score and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with Morbid Obesity-A Clinical Paradox.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Pan-Indian Reference Database for the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: A Need Indeed.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
- Burden of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis Among Postmenopausal Women in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Type 2 Diabetic Women with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
- Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanning in Practice, Technical Aspects, and Precision Testing.Journal of mid-life healthArticle
- A Clinical Study of a Standardized Extract of Leaves ofJournal of mid-life healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesCurrently available DXA (Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry) scanners utilise bone mineral density (BMD) of Caucasian population to calculate T scores and categorise BMD. We studied the influence of various databases on classification of BMD in south-Indian postmenopausal women aged above 50 years. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional study. Hologic DXA scanner was used to estimate BMD at lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). T scores of ≤-2.5, -2.4 to -1, -0.9 to +1 were diagnostic of osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal respectively. Three reference databases(Italian, Korean and north Indian) were used to recalculate T scores. The agreement (K=kappa) between manufacturer provided database and the other databases was studied. The impact of different databases in diagnosing osteoporosis in subjects with FN fracture was assessed.
resultsA total of 1956 postmenopausal women with mean (SD) age of 62 (4.3) years and 211 femoral neck(FN) fracture subjects with mean(SD) age of 68 (7.2) years were recruited. In subjects with fracture, osteoporosis at FN was found in 72% with Caucasian, 88% with North Indian, 56% with Italian, and 45% with Korean database. On comparing manufacturer provided database with the other population-specific reference, there was perfect agreement with north Indian (κ = 0.81 [FN], κ = 0.82 [LS]) and good agreement with the Italian database (κ = 0.78 [FN], κ = 0.74 [LS]).
conclusionNorth-Indian database identified most of the participants with FN fracture as having osteoporosis and had perfect agreement with the manufacturer's database. Follow up studies will further validate the impact of utilizing this database in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.