ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Surgical interventions for presbyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of presbyopia correction with the latest techniques of presbyLASIK: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Defocus Curve of Emerging Presbyopic Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Trial
- Treatments for Presbyopia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Exploring the Effect of Preoperative Stereopsis on Visual Outcomes in Hyperopic Presbyopes Treated with PresbyONDJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma-A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Impact of Light Conditions on Visual Performance following Premium Pseudophakic Presbyopia Corrections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Correction of presbyopia.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022Article
- Pharmacological treatment of presbyopia: A systematic review.European journal of translational myology · 2022Article
- A biomechanical model for evaluating the performance of accommodative intraocular lenses.Journal of biomechanics · 2022Article
- Article
- Classification of Presbyopia by Severity.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Article
- Pseudomyopia and Its Association With Anxiety.Cureus · 2021Review
- Intraocular lens correction of presbyopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- A Review of Pharmacological Presbyopia Treatment.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
- Patients' attitudes and beliefs to presbyopia and its correction.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presbyopia results from loss or insufficiency of the eye's accommodative ability, and clinically manifests as the inability to focus near objects on the retina. It is one of the most common causes of visual impairment worldwide especially in adults of productive or working age. Various means of compensating for the loss of accommodative ability have been devised from optical tools such as spectacles and contact lenses, to topical medications and to surgical procedures. A comprehensive search on journal articles about topical and surgical correction of presbyopia was undertaken. The various techniques for presbyopia correction, as enumerated in these articles, are discussed in this paper with the addition of our personal experience and perspective on the future of these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.