Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30294466›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2018

Developing and Piloting a Community Scientist Academy to Engage Communities and Patients in Research.

M Kathryn Stewart, Nicola Spencer, Anna Huff Davis, Camille Hart, Beatrice Boateng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. INNOVATE Research: Impact of a workshop to develop researcher capacity to engage youth in research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Kathryn StewartTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Nicola SpencerTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Anna Huff DavisTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Camille HartTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
Beatrice BoatengTranslational Research Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Funding

Weight Loss and Maintenance for Rural, African American Communities of FaithP20MD002329 · NIMHD · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI STEWART, KATHARINE E. · 2007 to 2016
$11.3M
Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
Arkansas Prevention Research Center for Cardiovascular Risk (HTN) ReductionU48DP005005 · DP · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI RACZYNSKI, JAMES M · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005005NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD002329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEffective translational research requires engagement and collaboration between communities, researchers, and practitioners. We describe a community scientist academy (CSA) developed at the suggestion of our CTSA's community advisory board to engage and capacitate community members by 1) increasing community members' and patients' understanding about the research process and 2) increasing their access to opportunities to influence and participate in research. A joint CTSA/community planning committee developed this 8-hour workshop including sessions on: 1) research definitions and processes; 2) study design; 3) study implementation; and 4) ways to get involved in research. The workshop format includes interactive exercises, content slides and videos, and researcher and community presenters.

methodsCommunity-based information sessions allowed assessment of community interest before piloting. Two pilots of the CSA were conducted with community members and patients. Participant data and a pre/post knowledge and feedback survey provides evaluation data.

resultsThe pilot included 24 diverse participants, over half of whom had not previously participated in research. Evaluation data suggest knowledge gains. Post- CSA, one third have reviewed CTSA pilot grants and over 80% want to attend further training.

conclusionsThe CSA can demystify the research process for those underrepresented in research and facilitate their engagement and influence within CTSAs.

Identifiers

PMID30294466
PMCPMC6171767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.