Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30294453›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2017

WHEN SCIENTIFIC PARADIGMS LEAD TO TUNNEL VISION: LESSONS FROM THE STUDY OF FEAR.

Denis Paré, Gregory J Quirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ventral Pallidum and Amygdala Cooperate to Restrain Reward Approach under Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Threat and Reward Imminence Processing in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. The Entangled Brain.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Piecing together the puzzle of emotional consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023
    Review
  10. Encoding of Environmental Cues in Central Amygdala Neurons during Foraging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Distributed and Multifaceted Effects of Threat and Safety.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The study of active avoidance: A platform for discussion.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denis ParéCenter for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers State University, Newark, New Jersey 07102.
Gregory J QuirkUniversity of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR 00936-5067.

Funding

The neural network of OCD, linking NHP and human studiesP50MH106435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Suzanne N Haber · 2015 to 2026
$28.9M
Prefrontal-Amygdala Interactions in Fear ConditioningR01MH058883 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI BRAVO-RIVERA, CHRISTIAN EMMANUELL · 2003 to 2022
$4.3M
Prefrontal-Amygdala Interactions in Fear ConditioningR37MH058883 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI QUIRK, GREGORY J · 2013 to 2020
$3.0M
Midline thalamic control of the amygdalaR01MH107239 · NIMH · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI PARE, DENIS · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106435NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058883NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107239NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH058883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past 30 years, research on the amygdala has largely focused on the genesis of defensive behaviors as its main function. This focus originated from early lesion studies and was supported by extensive anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological data. Here we argue that while much data is consistent with the fear model of amygdala function, it has never been directly tested, in part due to overreliance on the fear conditioning task. In support of the fear model, amygdala neurons appear to signal threats and/or stimuli predictive of threats. However, recent studies in a natural threat setting show that amygdala activity does not correlate with threats, but simply with the movement of the rat, independent of valence. This was true for both natural threats as well as conditioned stimuli; indeed there was no evidence of threat signaling in amygdala neurons. Similar findings are emerging for prefrontal neurons that modulate the amygdala. These recent developments lead us to propose a new conceptualization of amygdala function whereby the amygdala inhibits behavioral engagement. Moreover, we propose that the goal of understanding the amygdala will be best served by shifting away from fear conditioning toward naturalistic approach and avoidance paradigms that involve decision making and a larger repertoire of spontaneous and learned behaviors, all the while keeping an open mind.

Identifiers

PMID30294453
PMCPMC6171770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.