Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30294352›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2018

One-anastomosis gastric bypass as an alternative procedure of choice in morbidly obese patients.

Ali Solouki, Mohammad Kermansaravi, Amir Hossein Davarpanah Jazi, Ali Kabir, Taiebeh Mohammadi Farsani, Abdolreza Pazouki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali SoloukiMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad KermansaraviMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein Davarpanah JaziMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali KabirMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Taiebeh Mohammadi FarsaniMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdolreza PazoukiMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-anastomosis gastric bypass is an attractive bariatric procedure. It is effective in weight loss and comorbidity resolution. It is a relatively simple and fast operation with low complication rates that make it a suitable option in super-obese individuals. Although not proven yet, there are some concerns about its long-term safety profile in terms of biliary reflux, marginal ulcer, and esophagogastric malignancy. In this article, we review the technique of this procedure and discuss about some practical surgical highlights. Furthermore, we overview studies performed about this procedure and compare it to some other well-established bariatric operations, while providing a detailed study about the facts related to its outcomes and complications.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgerymorbid obesityone-anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID30294352
PMCPMC6161487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.