Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293647›Full record

ReviewBiological psychiatry2019

Perinatal Nutrition and Programmed Risk for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Focus on Animal Models.

Madison DeCapo, Jacqueline R Thompson, Geoffrey Dunn, Elinor L Sullivan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madison DeCapoDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton; Division of Cardiometabolic Health, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton.
Jacqueline R ThompsonDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton; Division of Cardiometabolic Health, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton.
Geoffrey DunnDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
Elinor L SullivanDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton; Division of Cardiometabolic Health, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton; Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. Electronic address: sullivel@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Developmental Exposure to Maternal Obesity-Induced Inflammation Impacts Offspring Brain and Negative Valence BehaviorsR01MH107508 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SULLIVAN, ELINOR L. · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
NIH HHS P51 OD011092NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal nutrition is critically important for fetal development. Recent human studies demonstrate a strong connection between diet during pregnancy and offspring risk for neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Animal models have emerged as a crucial tool for understanding maternal nutrition's contribution to prenatal programming and the later development of neuropsychiatric disorders. This review highlights preclinical studies examining how maternal consumption of the three macronutrients (protein, fats, and carbohydrates) influence offspring negative-valence behaviors relevant to neuropsychiatric disorders. We highlight the translational aspects of animal models and so examine exposure periods that mirror the neurodevelopmental stages of human gestation. Because of our emphasis on programmed changes in neurobehavioral development, studies that continue diet exposure until assessment in adulthood are not discussed. The presented research provides a strong foundation of preclinical evidence of nutritional programming of neurobehavioral impairments. Alterations in risk assessment and response were observed alongside neurodevelopmental impairments related to neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity. To date, the large majority of studies utilized rodent models, and the field could benefit from additional study of large-animal models. Additional future directions are discussed, including the need for further studies examining how sex as a biological variable affects the contribution of maternal nutrition to prenatal programming.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCritical Period, PsychologicalDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMental DisordersPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimal modelBehaviorMaternal dietNeuropsychiatric disordersNutritionPrenatal programming

Identifiers

PMID30293647
PMCPMC6309477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.