Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293232›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2019

Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of weekly oral vinorelbine in breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline or taxane-based regimens.

I Blancas, E Aguirre, S Morales, M L Gonzálvez, S Servitja, N Díaz, S Del Barco, A Barnadas, M Margelí, I García Carbonero and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

I BlancasDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital San Cecilio, Av. De la Investigación s/n, 18016, Granada, Spain. iblancas@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-118X
E AguirreDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
S MoralesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
M L GonzálvezDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
S ServitjaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
N DíazDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
S Del BarcoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Girona, Spain.
A BarnadasDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
M MargelíDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spain.
I García CarboneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Virgen de La Salud Hospital, Toledo, Spain.
A LlombartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan D'Alacant · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral weekly vinorelbine 60 mg/m MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-five patients were enrolled in a prospective multicentre study conducted in Spain. Women ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced breast cancer who were not candidates for surgical treatment with a radical intention or patients with stage IV disease, and who had received a prior taxane or anthracycline regimen were eligible for participation.

resultsMedian age was 67 years. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.5-4.9), median overall survival 10 months (95% CI 6.6-13.5), and overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were 29.1% and 49.1%, respectively. Main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia 9.1%, febrile neutropenia 3.6% and constipation 3.6%. In total, 86% of the patients received complete treatment without delays or dose reduction. Moreover, HER2-positive patients who received oral vinorelbine concomitantly with trastuzumab showed better response (complete response: HER2-positive 14.3% vs. HER2-negative 0%; partial response: HER2-positive 42.9% vs. HER2-negative 25.6%; p = 0.008), better disease control rate (HER2-positive 100% vs. HER2-negative 46.2%; p = 0.011), and better values for the remaining analysed variables than HER2-negative patients.

conclusionOur study provides real-world data on the use of oral weekly vinorelbine, which proves an effective and well-tolerated regimen for MBC patients previously treated with taxanes or anthracyclines. Patients with HER2-positive disease could also benefit from this treatment in combination with trastuzumab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesSpainSurvival AnalysisAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTaxoidsTrastuzumabVinorelbineHER2 statusMetastatic breast cancerOral vinorelbineProgression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID30293232
OpenAlexW2894702253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.