Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30293178›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Quantitative assessment of dietary supplement intake in 77,000 French adults: impact on nutritional intake inadequacy and excessive intake.

Philippine Fassier, Manon Egnell, Camille Pouchieu, Marie-Paule Vasson, Patrice Cohen, Pilar Galan, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Paule Latino-Martel, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philippine FassierSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France. p.fassier@eren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-8485
Manon EgnellSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Camille PouchieuSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Marie-Paule VassonUFR Pharmacie, Inra, UMR 1019, CRNH Auvergne, Centre Jean-Perrin, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, Unité de Nutrition, Clermont Université Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Patrice CohenSociology Department, University of Rouen, DySola, EA 4701, 76821, Rouen, France.
Pilar GalanSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Emmanuelle Kesse-GuyotSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Paule Latino-MartelSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Serge HercbergSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Mélanie DeschasauxSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Mathilde TouvierSorbonne Paris Cité Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center (CRESS), Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Inserm U1153, Inra U1125, Cnam, SMBH, Paris 13 University, 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017, Bobigny Cedex, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary supplements (DS) are largely consumed in Western countries without demonstrating their nutritional benefits and safety in the general population. The aims, in a large population-based study of French adults, were: (1) to compare the prevalence of nutrient intake inadequacy and the proportion of individuals exceeding tolerable upper intake levels (UL) between DS users and non-users, and (2) to quantify the extent of potentially "at-risk" DS use practices (e.g., DS/drugs contraindicated association or use of beta-carotene DS in smokers).

methods76,925 participants, 47.6% men and 52.4% women, mean age 46.9 ± 16.3 years were enrolled to the NutriNet-Santé cohort and they completed a quantitative DS questionnaire and three 24 h dietary records. A composition database including > 8000 DS was developed. Variance reduction was applied to estimate usual intakes and analyses were weighted according to the French census data.

resultsAmong DS users of the specific nutrient, DS contributed to 41% of total intake for vitamin D in men, 55% in women; and to 20% of total intake for pyridoxine in men, 21% in women. Compared to dietary intakes only, their prevalence of inadequacy was reduced by 11% for vitamin C, 9% for magnesium, 6% for pyridoxine in men, and 19% for calcium, 12% for iron, and 11% for magnesium in women (p < 0.0001). The proportion of subjects exceeding UL reached 6% for iron and 5% for magnesium in men, and 9% for iron in women. 6% of DS users had potentially "at-risk" practices.

conclusionWhile DS use contributed to decrease the prevalence of insufficient intake for several nutrients, it also conveyed excessive intake of iron and magnesium. Besides, a substantial proportion of potentially "at-risk" DS use practices was reported.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDietary SupplementsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary supplementsDrug interactionsNutrient intake inadequacyTolerable upper intake levels

Identifiers

PMID30293178
OpenAlexW2894604576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.